Alan Davies writes from Down Under about a recent controversy in the Australian media about the “menace” of cycling in the urban core—where some are tired of the bicycle lobby's advancements of its cause.
The closing paragraph of a recent editorial in The Australian makes a blunt point: “For too long, authorities have bowed to the demands of selfish cyclists and their lobby groups.” A blog post by Alan Davies argues most strongly, however, in response to the penultimate line of the editorial: “Truth is, our cities are dominated by cars because they are sprawling.” Davies does not accept the argument that “nothing can be done to redress the conflict between drivers and cyclists because it’s a structural issue.”
First of all, Davies points out that the editorial’s claims of the ubiquity of sprawling conditions doesn’t even apply to the “dooring” incident that prompted the editorial. “The dooring incident cited by The Australian didn’t happen in the car-oriented suburbs but in Melbourne’s CBD, on the corner of Collins and Swanston.” There, despite the editorial’s wishful thinking, cars aren’t even the dominant mode of transportation: “cars don’t dominate the CBD; they’re a minor mode. For example, the great majority of work trips to and from the CBDs of Sydney and Melbourne (around 70-80%) are made by public transport, not cars.”
In the end, Davies’s point is that more work can be done to increase the safety of all modes: “Conflict between cyclists and pedestrians is an issue that needs to be addressed. But so does conflict between cars and cyclists. The hands of policy-makers aren’t tied by supposedly intractable structural forces like sprawl; they can and should make cycling safer…”
For the record, not all editorials in Australia have been so overtly anti-bicycle. A separate editorial in The Sydney Morning Herald calls for a “cycle of co-operation” laying the onus at the feet of both policy makers and bikers to make take steps to make the streets safer.
FULL STORY: Is the “menace of urban cycling” all about sprawl?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.

Study: Anti-Homelessness Laws Don’t Work
Research shows that punitive measures that criminalized unhoused people don’t help reduce homelessness.

The French Solution to Congested Tunnels: Make Them Car-Free
Bay Area transportation officials keep expanding car capacity. Lyon’s Croix Rousse Tunnel offers a different way.

Missouri Governor Reverses Anti-Discrimination Housing Policies
A new state law bars cities from prohibiting source-of-income discrimination against tenants using Section 8 housing vouchers.

USDOT Launches Unfunded 'SAFE ROADS' Program
The program targets “distractions” and “political messages or artwork,” and paves the way for autonomous vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Fort Worth
planning NEXT
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie