For the second time, a court has thrown out EPA efforts to address pollution from power plants in 'clean-air' states that cause pollution downwind. This time, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule was the victim.
"Twice in eight years" is how the New York Times editorial addressed Tuesday's (August 21) Appeal Court rejection of the EPA's new rule to "reduce sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in order to help States meet their National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone and particulate matter (PM2.5)", as defined by the 2005 Clean Air Interstate Rule.
The Cross-State Air Pollution Rule was designed to replace the CAIR. It "requires states to significantly improve air quality by reducing power plant emissions that contribute to ozone and/or fine particle pollution in other states."
"In a 2-to-1 ruling, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said the E.P.A. had exceeded its authority in the way it apportioned the cleanup work among 28 upwind states. The court said the E.P.A.'s rule also violated the Clean Air Act because it did not let the states submit their own plans to comply and imposed a federal plan instead.
The Environmental Protection Agency was trying to address a problem that has vexed the air pollution control system for at least three decades: how to deal with states whose own air meets standards but whose power plants, refineries and other industrial plants emit sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide pollutants that - wind-aided - prevent neighboring states from attaining the level of cleanliness required under federal law.
"At the Sierra Club, Mary Anne Hitt, director of the group's Beyond Coal Campaign, said in a statement, "Americans have been waiting for the clean air they deserve for decades, and the court's ruling today further delays the Clean Air Act's promise of safe, breathable air for our children."
"She estimated the rule could have prevented 34,000 premature deaths a year."
EPA is left with two choices: Go back to the drawing board and hope they don't strike out in a third attempt to satisfy the court - that process will take about three or four years, or appeal the ruling.
FULL STORY: Court Blocks E.P.A. Rule on Cross-State Pollution
The Mall Is Dead — Long Live the Mall
The American shopping mall may be closer to its original vision than ever.
The Paradox of American Housing
How the tension between housing as an asset and as an essential good keeps the supply inadequate and costs high.
Report: Las Vegas, Houston Top List of Least Affordable Cities
The report assesses the availability of affordable rental units for low-income households.
Understanding Affordable Housing Lingo
20 key terms in the affordable housing discussion.
Undoing Biden's EV Rule
The partisan divide over how government should reduce greenhouse gas emissions was on full display after the Biden administration finalized its emissions standards rule for light and medium duty vehicles on March 20.
Boston Moves Zoning Reform Forward
The ‘Squares + Streets’ plan creates form-based zoning templates for neighborhoods that promote mixed use and denser housing near transit.
City of Yakima
City of Auburn
Baylands Development Inc.
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
City of Birmingham, Alabama
City of Laramie, Wyoming
Town of Zionsville
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.