What makes this plan for increasing capacity and improving the passenger experience for the 120,000 arriving and departing passengers who ride 300 trains into and out of the station every weekday different from its predecessors? Mayor Rahm Emanuel's administration believes the solution resides in "lowering its sights to more realistic short-term projects with identified funding while still maintaining a list of medium- and long-term plans that could be done if the money is ever found," writes Spielman.
According to Jeff Sriver, the strategy in developing the plan was to, "take a step back from the grand, visionary ideas of the past that would have added new track and subway tunnels to bypass Union Station or, perhaps, relied on tearing down existing buildings and building a new structure in their place."
So while Los Angeles has asked teams of architects to "think big" about the future of its Union Station, Chicago has taken the opposite track.
"What are the steps we can take immediately to more realistically solve some of the urgent problems at Union Station? It's serving more people during peak periods than it ever has. It was once more for long-distance travelers. Now, most of the traffic is commuters. There's a lot of congestion on the platforms as well as in the station and getting out of the station. And the problems are only going to get worse," says Sriver.
