The Federal Interest in Non-Highway Transportation

As Congress begins to draft transportation legislation next year, fiscal scarcity may induce a fight between transit and highway advocates over federal funding, rather than the cooperation of the last few years.  And if highway advocates seek to tear down federal support for other forms of transportation, they will probably rely heavily on federalism considerations, arguing that highways are inherently an interstate concern while transit and non-motorized forms of transportation are a nonfederal concern.  For example, Alan Pisarski writes: “If sidewalks and bike paths are federal then everything is federal.” There are two flaws in this argument.  First of all, highways are not always primarily an interstate concern

3 minute read

December 14, 2010, 9:15 PM PST

By Michael Lewyn @mlewyn


As Congress begins to draft transportation legislation next year, fiscal scarcity
may induce a fight between transit and highway advocates over federal funding,
rather than the cooperation of the last few years.  And if highway advocates seek to tear down federal support
for other forms of transportation, they will probably rely heavily on
federalism considerations, arguing that highways are inherently an interstate
concern while transit and non-motorized forms of transportation are a
nonfederal concern.  For example, Alan
Pisarski writes: "If sidewalks and bike paths are federal then everything
is federal."

There are two flaws in this argument.  First of all, highways are not always
primarily an interstate concern.  To be
sure, the interstate highway system as a whole does connect the states.  But at the margins, highway improvements
often have a large local component.  For
example, suppose that Georgia
transportation officials wish to create a new interchange for I-285, in Atlanta's inner suburbs,
about 100 miles from the nearest state border. 
 The people most affected by the
interchange will not be out-of-state businesses, but the people who live near
the interchange (who might have faster commutes if they are lucky) and
developers who will wish to build near the interchange (assuming that the
faster commutes make the interchange a more desirable destination).   

Second, other forms of transportation have interstate
benefits as well.  The easiest possible
example, of course, is public transit in a multistate metropolitan area, such
as Washington's subway lines (which go
from the District of Columbia to Maryland and Virginia)
and Philadelphia's PATCO train (which goes from
downtown Philadelphia to its New Jersey suburbs). 

What about a more purely local service such as, say, a bus
line in Jacksonville?   The bus doesn't directly benefit Georgians-
but then again, the new I-285 interchange doesn't directly benefit
Floridians.   And both may address national problems that
ultimately affect everyone.  For example,
both the interchange advocates and the bus advocates will argue that their
policies reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other forms of pollution, problems
that are national and even international because pollutants travel across state
and even national borders.   The bus
advocate will argue that the buses take cars off the road, while the
interchange advocate will argue that by making traffic flow more smoothly, the
interchange too reduces pollution.  My
point is not that either argument is right or wrong, but that both arguments address
problems that are not limited by state borders.

What about a sidewalk or a bike path?  Because these may cover such a narrow
geographic area, these seem to be even less national than subsidies for cars
and buses.  But if the bus reduces
pollution and congestion by taking a few cars off the road, so does the sidewalk and the bike path.  And by encouraging exercise, the sidewalk and
the bike path improve physical fitness and reduce obesity and the diseases it
creates.  Are these national
problems?  Probably not as much as
pollution- but health problems too have national effects, affecting federal
spending on Medicare and Medicaid, and affecting state and local spending as
unhealthy people, like healthy ones, move across state lines.  

I would not go so far as to argue that every transportation project
has an equal interstate impact.  But it
does seem to me, however, that the line between "federal" and "local"
transportation projects is not as bright a line as some commentators might
think.


Michael Lewyn

Michael Lewyn is an associate professor at Touro University, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, in Long Island. His scholarship can be found at http://works.bepress.com/lewyn.

Sweeping view of Portland, Oregon with Mt. Hood in background against sunset sky.

Oregon Passes Exemption to Urban Growth Boundary

Cities have a one-time chance to acquire new land for development in a bid to increase housing supply and affordability.

March 12, 2024 - Housing Wire

Aerial view of green roofs with plants in Sydney, Australia.

Where Urban Design Is Headed in 2024

A forecast of likely trends in urban design and architecture.

March 10, 2024 - Daily Journal of Commerce

Cobblestone street with streetcar line, row of vintage streetlights on left, and colorful restaurant and shop awnings on right on River Street in Savannah, Georgia.

Savannah: A City of Planning Contrasts

From a human-scales, plaza-anchored grid to suburban sprawl, the oldest planned city in the United States has seen wildly different development patterns.

March 12, 2024 - Strong Towns

Aerial View of Chuckanut Drive and the Blanchard Bridge in the Skagit Valley.

Washington Tribes Receive Resilience Funding

The 28 grants support projects including relocation efforts as coastal communities face the growing impacts of climate change.

March 18 - The Seattle Times

Historic buildings in downtown Los Angeles with large "Pan American Lofts" sign on side of building.

Adaptive Reuse Bills Introduced in California Assembly

The legislation would expand eligibility for economic incentives and let cities loosen regulations to allow for more building conversions.

March 18 - Beverly Press

View from above of swan-shaped paddleboats with lights on around artesian fountain in Echo Park Lake with downtown Los Angeles skylien in background at twilight.

LA's Top Parks, Ranked

TimeOut just released its list of the top 26 parks in the L.A. area, which is home to some of the best green spaces around.

March 18 - TimeOut

News from HUD User

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Call for Speakers

Mpact Transit + Community

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Write for Planetizen

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.