Home › News ›

Bus vs. Rail: An Oversimplified Comparison

Posted by: Tim Halbur

12 December 2009 - 11:00am

Most comparisons of bus and rail systems assume a classic city with a central business district that commuters need to reach, and that each serve a single function, say Jeffrey R. Brown and Gregory R. Thompson of Florida State.

Brown and Thompson compared data from San Diego, Atlanta, Minneapolis and Pittsburg, and concluded that a combined rail/bus system is the most effective.

"The debate generally overlooks the several other functions that express bus and rail transit modes might serve, and thus it ignores the fact that the two modes perform differently depending upon the regional transit service mission that they are assigned. Transit planners and policymakers who are considering whether to invest in one mode or the other cannot make an informed decision without simultaneously considering the mission to which one mode or the other will be assigned."

The PDF is only available for purchase or in the printed Transportation Research Record.

Full Story: Express Bus Versus Rail Transit
Source: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, December 9, 2009
»
Bookmark and Share
“
"It's so out of control," said Duany, referring to the current state of public participation in planning decisions in the United States. "It's an absolute orgy of public process… basically, we can't get anything done."
”