Cities Facing Turf Questions
Water saver or environmental hazard? Questions are compounding about artificial turf as more homeowners ditch their grass for fake lawns. Contradicting city policies muddy the issue in the arid Southwest.
Planetizen Assistant Editor Nate Berg reports on how some cities are responding to increased demand for artificial turf -- both as a water-saving device and an easier way to keep up green appearances.
"As Garden Grove is allowing it, however, other Southwest municipalities are finding reasons to say no to faux. Glendale, Ariz., had once given rebates to residents for installing artificial turf as a water-saving alternative. The savings turned out to be modest and conversions ended up causing environmental problems. The city stopped giving rebates after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released an advisory in June 2008 associating artificial turf with a potential exposure to lead dust, created as the fibers making up some phony grass blades age and wear."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Turf Troubles - Aug 09, 2009
- Learning Water Conservation on the Golf Course - Aug 07, 2009
- Lose Lawn, Gain Money - Jul 21, 2009
- Peak Water: Tapping Out the Ogallala Aquifer - May 20, 2009
- The Death of the Lawn - Sep 20, 2008















