Idea to Tax Drivers By the Mile Gathers Support in Washington
Washington's top transportation official has indicated support for the idea of beefing up transportation funds by taxing drivers by the mile.
"Washington state should allow a pilot project to tax drivers by the mile in King, Pierce and Snohomish counties, a Seattle official said Tuesday."
"'Let us try it,' Seattle Department of Transportation Director Grace Crunican said during a morning Urban Land Institute discussion on how to meet massive and changing infrastructure needs."
"...David Dye, deputy secretary of the Washington Department of Transportation, said state residents are not ready to accept paying for roads, and routinely point out that 'freeway' has 'free' right in the name.
But tolls are coming back to the central Puget Sound, Dye said. 'That's going to be a critical part of how we finance our transportation infrastructure in the future.'
Washington has around $80 billion in unfunded transportation infrastructure needs, with about half of that in the central Puget Sound, Dye said."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Six Trending Urbanist Themes for the New Year - Dec 31, 2011
- Increasing State Gas Taxes Insufficient To Meet Road Projects' Costs - Dec 27, 2011
- As Congress Rejects Transportation Funding, Voters Embrace It - Nov 18, 2011
- A Road Tax on Electric Cars - Apr 25, 2011
- Texas to Study Per-Mile Gas Tax - Jan 06, 2010
Planetizen picks
Contribute
- NY Times Defends the Port Authority
- Expanding the Hong Kong Subway, One Blast at a Time
- Can An Electric Bike Replace A Car?
- The Growing Popularity of Women-Only Mass Transit
- Putting the Bloom Back on the Rose Bowl
- Friday Funny: Smellvertising, Coming to a Bus Stop Near You
- Senate Yeas While House Nays on Transportation
- Seeing a Bright Side to the Architecture Meltdown
- Super Slim Me?
- Why NASA's Spectacular Image of the Earth is So Disturbing
Volunteerism Plays Critical Role in Reaching World’s Millennium Development Goals
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University
Feb 10, 2012
Web Seminar: Economic Development in a Digital World: Home-Based Businesses and Virtual Workers
International Economic Development Council
Feb 08, 2012
www.flickr.com
|
Size matters
VMT-taxing should be calibrated to weight, so that a Hummer pays a higher rate per mile than a Mini. After all, the cost to society in terms of road wear, accidental damge, etc. is higher for higher weight vehicles.
Size matters, but size is not always interchangeable with weight
I half agree and half disagree with you. I agree that a Hummer should pay more per mile/kilometre than a Mini, but realistically, the Hummer is still extremely light when compared with a delivery truck and essentially does no damage to the pavement. And if you live in a northern climate (like I do in Winnipeg) the freeze-thaw cycles do much more damage than any non-commercial vehicles do.
Charging based on VMT (VKT in Canada) is a good idea, but it is essentially a charge to recoup the costs of congestion and environmental damage. The Hummer should pay more based on its size and its contribution to congestion, not pavement damage. Weight is a factor but only as it contributes to bad gas mileage, which is maybe another thing that vehicles should be charged based on.