A few feet

Michael Lewyn's picture
Blogger

Because of President-elect Obama's plans to spend billions of dollars on infrastructure, some recent discussion of smart growth has focused on proposals for huge projects, such as rebuilding America's rail network.

But walkability often depends on much smaller steps, steps that require changes in tiny increments of space.

For example, take a typical tree-lined, upper-class suburban neighborhood, such as the fancier blocks of Atlanta's Buckhead.   A four-foot wide sidewalk, although not ideal, can make such a neighborhood very pleasant and walkable.  (For an example, see http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p14704743.html )

Now substitute a strip of lawn for the sidewalk. (For examples, see http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p44263562.html and http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p14008023.html ) The neighborhood is not so inviting to pedestrians; although it is certainly possible to walk on this strip of lawn, the lawn can be muddy in rough weather, and a pedestrian might feel uncomfortable walking on something that is not obviously public space.  Nevertheless, a city that cannot afford to build new sidewalks would be well advised to encourage homeowners to allow a small easement on their lawn for pedestrians, since the lawn strip is better than the alternative, which is

Nothing.  In much of Atlanta, homeowners allow trees and bushes to go right up to the street, rather than flanking the street with lawns.  (For an example, see http://atlantaphotos.fotopic.net/p14010314.html ) As a result, pedestrians must walk on the street, sharing that street with vehicles. 

In sum, the fate of one or two strips of land just four feet wide makes the difference between a reasonably walkable residential street, a somewhat pedestrian-unfriendly street, and a street that virtually excludes pedestrians.

Even in the latter situation, a few feet makes a difference between the worst possible street and a merely bad one.  On many sidewalk-less residential streets, cars go 40 miles per hour, creating a very risky situation for pedestrians.  By contrast, when I visited my parents' vacation house in the mountains of North Carolina, people routinely hiked in the middle of the street.  Why?  Because the street was narrow enough that vehicle traffic was relatively slow, thus allowing pedestrians to reclaim the street to some extent.  Again, a few feet made a big difference.

Michael Lewyn is an assistant professor at Touro Law Center in Long Island.

Comments

Comments

Right on.

Right on.

Agreed

It's amazing how much sidewalks can improve a neighborhood. I am familiar with the neighborhoods you talk about in Dunwoody. In my neighborhood in Knoxville, TN, it was as though the planners (in the 40's) not only didn't plan for pedestrians, but almost intentionally made it difficult for them. There are roads with steep hills, short visibility, with retaining walls on one side up to the asphalt and sheer drop-offs on the other -- essentially nowhere for someone to walk unless they want to be unsafe.

--
Chris Eaker
placemaking.wordpress.com

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Insider's Guide to Careers in Urban Planning

So you want to be a planner...

Check out our behind the scenes look at 25 careers in the Urban Planning field
Starting at $14.95
DVD Cover of The Story of Sprawl

The Story of Sprawl

See how America changed shape in this collection of historic films that visually document how sprawl evolved.
$29.99 for 2-DVD SET