The panel headed by former MTA chief Richard Ravitch held its first public hearing Monday at NYU's Kimmel Center. A variety of proposals surfaced, including congestion pricing, to help the MTA navigate its current funding crisis.
Streetsblog was there to observe the afternoon session and give a brief rundown of the themes that surfaced repeatedly:
"Responsibility for adequately funding the MTA should fall on those who benefit from its services. This encompasses a fairly broad swath of people, including straphangers, the real estate industry, and car commuters (who get less traffic on the street when more people use transit). Many of these 'stakeholders' already contribute something to the MTA in the form of fares or dedicated taxes, and could be asked to pay higher rates going forward. Several people testified that some form of road pricing or bridge tolling would be an additional stream of revenue consistent with this philosophy."
"The MTA needs more consistent and reliable revenue streams. Congestion pricing fits the bill in this regard, too. The need for predictable revenue also led speakers to suggest more broad-based taxes, unlike the targeted taxes mentioned above. (Taxes collected from the real estate industry have proven especially fickle recently.) Kevin Corbett of the Empire State Transportation Alliance recommended both road pricing and a payroll tax, saying that 'if you have multiple parties sharing in the pain, it's easier to do a deal.' He added, 'Looking at the enormity of the task, we suspect it will be a combination of the various taxes [and] fees.'"
