The Golden Gate Bridge District, in agreeing to apply congestion pricing to the bridge, has saved the $158 million Urban Partnership grant for the Bay Area in the nick of time, but has created turmoil with S.F because of where the revenue goes.
The Golden Gate Bridge District's Friday meeting "degenerated into an angry war of words between San Francisco and North Bay members of the bridge district's board of directors, which approved a resolution to charge tolls that rise and fall with the level of traffic but prohibited the use of any of the proceeds to help pay for a new Doyle Drive approach to the bridge in San Francisco.
The two motions passed on 10-8 votes, split along geographic lines. Before the board meeting, it appeared that the resolution would pass with wording that gave directors control over the toll proceeds and allowed the revenue to be used on San Francisco's Doyle Drive or for projects and services of the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, including its ferries and buses.
But director Al Boro, San Rafael's mayor, made a motion to restrict the revenues to the bridge district, and a verbal brawl ensued."
Boro added the caveat to "quell fears that the congestion toll would be used to help pay the $1.1 billion reconstruction of San Francisco's Doyle Drive, creating (what has beed dubbed) a "commuter tax" on people who cross the bridge from Marin and Sonoma counties."
"Essentially, they declared war on San Francisco and on their own people, since they voted to allow a road that is deficient to go on for who knows how many years," San Francisco Supervisor Jake McGoldrick said in an interview after the meeting."
The deadline for receiving authority to apply congestion pricing on either the bridge or Doyle Drive, to meet the federal requirement to receive the $158 million grant is March 31. Had San Francisco chosen to toll Doyle Drive, thus controlling the revenues, they would have needed the state legislature's approval.
"The details of the new congestion toll, including its cost, will be figured out in the next six weeks. A June public hearing is scheduled. The toll could go into effect as early as September but must be in place by September 2009.
The toll will be in addition to another increase in the works: a proposed $6 cash, $5 FasTrak toll plan."
Thanks to Gerald Cauthen
