Sprawl: History Or Myth?

A critical review of Robert Bruegmann's book 'Sprawl: A Compact History' asserts that Bruegmann's work exemplifies several common myths about sprawl.

1 minute read

September 19, 2006, 11:00 AM PDT

By Michael Lewyn @mlewyn

The most unusual part of Bruegmann's book is his use of history to defend the status quo; he implies that the urge for sprawl is eternal, based on precedents as far apart as ancient Rome and America today. But this theory overlooks the differences between pedestrian-friendly cities with some sprawling development and cities in which automobile-dependent sprawl is the only choice available to most consumers.

In addition, Bruegmann underestimates the role of government subsidies and regulation in creating the American status quo, and understates the harmful social effects of sprawl, especially the effect of automobile-dependent development upon nondrivers.

Thanks to Michael Lewyn

FULL STORY: Five Myths About Sprawl

Monday, September 18, 2006 in Social Science Research Network

Land Use Social / Demographics Transportation United States

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

Start Learning

Advertise with us

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.