Car-less In Seattle

Pedestrian pioneer Alan Durning describes what his family of five is learning by living without four wheels in Cascadia's largest city. Can they survive without the essential currency of the modern American community?

Alan Durning

Car-less In Seattle

A few months ago, my 18-year-old son slammed our 19-year-old Volvo station wagon into the rear of a high-clearance pickup. All the people were fine. So was the pickup.

But the Volvo wasn't. Repairing it would have cost many times the Blue Book value. So we accepted the insurance company's check for $594 and bid farewell to the family car.

Happenstance thus made us car-free. But after some serious discussion with my wife Amy and our three children, we decided to stay that way. Are we crazy? We don't think so. We've been reducing our car use for some time; I work in the sustainability field; and we live in a compact, walkable community. We decided to try car-free living as an experiment for a year, to see whether a middle-class family of five could live a contented life in Seattle, Cascadia's largest city, without owning their own car.

Thanks to past choices plus some good fortune, car-free living is a smaller disruption for us than for most people. Our three kids are old enough (the youngest is now 11) to walk or bike unaccompanied to a lot of places. We live in a compact city neighborhood -- Ballard, a typical Seattle streetcar neighborhood -- with an abundance of nearby amenities. We've got respectable local transit service and five FlexCars stationed within a mile of our home.

We replaced the station wagon with our 1996 Burley stroller/bike trailer. We've resurrected it to haul groceries, library books, and (recently) a broken vacuum cleaner. The Burley's range is only as far as you want to push it. And for my family, that limit seems to be about one mile. Less than a mile is a comfortable walk; more is a burden.

Photo: The Burley stroller.

The Burley stroller. (Source: Alan Durning)

In the process, we're truly discovering our "walkshed" -- what we call the one-mile perimeter that is our pedestrian travel zone. Fortunately, because we chose to live in a compact community, our walkshed turns out to be well stocked. We can stroll to scores of shops and services -- 248 to be precise. I know because I counted. (You can count your own walkshed score; this Daily Score blog post explains)

Our experiment has brought challenges too. One of the biggest was highlighted in a recent Seattle Weekly column about local car-less experiments. The writer criticized us because we weren't going entirely car-free -- we were "mooching rides", as he put it, a practice he likened to bumming cigarettes while trying to quit.

The column sparked a spirited response in the Seattle blogosphere, with many comments attacking the writer for describing our occasional car-sharing as "mooching". I believe that's because the writer was touching on a critical cultural issue --the dual relationship that our society has with cars.

Cars, I've come to believe, operate in two economies -- the cash economy, where you pay for them in dollars, and the gift economy, where you pay for them in favors -- basically, rides exchanged.

This is especially true in parenting. The most routine favor that parents give -- the currency of parenting -- is the ride. I give your kid a ride to practice; you give mine a ride home. You bring your kid over to play; I drive her home again.

The swapping of rides is a convenience, of course. But it's also a form of community building. In fact, anthropologists regard the reciprocal doing of favors as not just a form of community building but as the essence of community building.

When the bonds of mutual reciprocity are thick and stretch in many directions, you have a strong community -- one that's high in social capital. And you've got the feeling, as a parent, that many hands are there to support you.

But subtract the car from this equation, and you're suddenly out of currency for the most basic exchanges.

Friends have reacted to our car-less state in different ways. Some have stepped up, hero-like, and insisted on doing all the driving themselves, insisting that we don't use Flexcar when they already own one. Some have withdrawn, uncertain how to interact with us because we don't hold the currency. Feeling this way, they often take the path of least resistance, which is to swap rides with someone else instead. Sadly, that leaves us, and our kids, out of the community.

To guard against heroic over-giving and shy withdrawal, we have been trying to become more assertive about alternative exchanges, bartering child care and other favors for rides when a ride is necessary.

Despite the ambiguity (How many hours of child care are worth one ride?), other parents are receptive, and these more-complicated exchanges build community just as quickly as ride swapping.

Sometimes, it even gives us more community. One of Amy's buddies reports that she loves that we don't have a car because she gets to see Amy more. They get groceries together. The friend drives; Amy buys the lunch. They both enjoy the outing.

You could call it mooching. Or you could call it friendship.

Alan Durning, executive director of the Seattle-based think tank Sightline Institute (formerly Northwest Environment Watch), is lead author of Cascadia Scorecard 2005: Seven Key Trends Shaping the Northwest.

You can read and comment on Alan's blog posts chronicling his family's car-less adventure on Sightline's blog, The Daily Score.




I am so jealous!!!

How to convince the wife to do this?!?!?!

Hitchin' a Ride

Back in the early 80's, we ex-New Yorkers were carless in Oakland, California. We got a lot of rides, especially to night meetings. I don't think people resented giving them to us, but maybe I was clueless. Of course we were in mid-20's and childless, so maybe it seemed more natural for us.

I don't understand the "mooching" thing, though. If people are going your direction, you're just using space that would otherwise would be wasted. Of course asking for a ride every day would be different.

By riding with people, you also create a social occasion. During the short period when my family had two cars (we now have one), my wife and I found we saw each other much less. Of course sometimes people don't want to be social with a passenger. I don't think most carfree people have taken a religious vow never to set foot inside a car.


Wonderful commentary Alan. ALthough I now reside in Washington, DC with a cornucopia of public transit options laid before me--including various flex car program, I lived until recently in Broward County, Florida--a center of sprawl if there is one. I was car free for a significant period of time, off and on for 4 years while living in downtown Fort Lauderdale.

I was viewed almost with disdain(and certainly as a an oddity) by many for my rejection of the automobile during my Fort Lauderdale tenure. I lived 2 blocks from a public bus terminal that gave me accces to the 3 South Florida Counties and a shuttle bus to the regional commuter rail station that runs from Miami to north of West Palm Beach.

I walked to the grocery store, pharmacy, City Hall, post office, library, my doctors, the dentist--I even walked to many shopping centers and to revitalized commercial districts for dinner and other
recreational activities. I took the bus to the airport(unless I was running late--then I employed a cab).

Now, I don't have children, and I can't say that my partner was always pleased about the arrangement(she drove to work on many occasions), but I structured my life in such a way that a car fell well down the list of "necessities."

I received the same type of criticism as Alan for my lack of purity.
Where does this almost Calvinistic "all or nothing" ideolgy spring from? Sure I employed ride sharing, and yes I used cabs on occasion and yes I rented a car or truck when I needed one. The point is not that we need absolute adherence to not riding in a fossil fuel-powered vehicle, it is a philosophical departure from the norm(which is reliance on the automobile)that creates for many a better quality of life.

If I can structure a car free life in the land of Sprawl(although my friends in Southern California would argue that it's impossible there)
then it can be done almost anywhere with the right amount of planning and creativity.

Charles D'Aprix(Chuck D'Aprix)
Economic Development Visions
The Downtown Entrepreneurship Project

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Where Things Are from Near to Far

Where Things Are From Near to Far

This engaging children's book about planning illustrates that "every building has its place."

Wear your city with style!

100% silk scarves feature detailed city maps. Choose from six cities with red or blue trim.