New Towers Designed To Become San Francisco Landmarks

25 July 2006 - 3:00pm

Approved twin towers at the base of the San Francisco entrance to the Bay Bridge are designed to withstand earthquakes and hurricane gales.

"It is always a challenge to build a high-rise on top of a hill in earthquake country, particularly in San Francisco, which still harbors dark memories of the great quake and fire that destroyed the city 100 years ago. Now the city has complex building codes, and putting up a tower on the top of a hill has special challenges -- not just earthquakes, but strong winds that blow off the Pacific in winter, sometimes over 75 miles an hour, hurricane force on the Beaufort Wind Scale...

Back in the 20th century, a skyscraper would be built around a steel frame, the way a human is built around a skeleton. But now, many tall buildings are built around a concrete core, poured around reinforced steel for strength...One advantage of the core construction as opposed to the steel-frame method is that the condos in the towers would not have structural members obscuring the windows. This means floor-to-ceiling windows and spectacular views. The better the view, the more the developer can charge...

The tower has yet another unusual feature -- on the very top are two water tanks holding about 100,000 gallons combined. Each tank will also have two liquid damper screens to control the flow of the water. The purpose of the tanks is to counter the sway of the building in a high wind...But the design idea is that if the wind tends to move the building one way, the water would provide a counterbalance for stability. This concept has never been used in this country before."

Source: The San Francisco Chronicle, July 2, 2006

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My Opinion

I think this project is a great step forward for SF. Many people have objected to this project, crying location mostly, and nothing to back it up. SF is running out of space extremly quick. The only option is to build up. This will expande they skyline, nit destroy it. It adds a piece of the future to SF. It is an amazingly planned project. Green, beautiful, and amazing location on the hill.

NAUTF | North American Urban Transit Forum

Where's the passion?

Is there no passion or vision left in today's architecture? These generic buildings look like something recycled from the 80's.

Bookmark and Share
Like the allegories and myths that each camp employs, I too have simplified for the purposes of communicating my point.