Driving Costs Escalate With Stockholm's Congestion Tax
Addition of a commuter tax and higher gas prices will make driving more expensive in Stockholm in the coming year.
Translated from the original Swedish article by Carl Morgan.
Maintaining a car in Stockholm may be 7,000 SEK ($878 US) more next year
Published December 27, 2005, 5:30 AM
It will be more expensive next year to own a car and live in Stockholm. In 2006 it will cost around 7000 SEK ($878 US) more this year for Stockholm residents who commute by car to work between the city and its suburbs. This is according to a study by the Institute for Private Economics, a part of the Swedish bank Föreningsparbanken, and commissioned by Taxi Stockholm.
The increase is primarily due to the new congestion tax, but increases in fuel costs are also making it more expensive to be a Stockholm resident with a car. Current gas prices are around 11.31 SEK per liter ($1.42/liter or $3.79/gallon), but gas prices have been much higher during the past year. "It's already a poor deal to commute between the inner city and the suburbs in your own car and it is getting all the more expensive," said Ylva Yngveson, Director of the Institute for Private Economics.
Now people are having to ask themselves if they really need a car. For a family with small children, 7000 SEK is a lot of money. According to the Institute's estimates, it costs 65,340 SEK ($8192 US) per year to own and maintain a Volkswagen Golf 1.6 FSI in Stockholm. This estimate includes driving approximately 15000 km (9321 miles) per year and a congestion tax of 15 SEK ($1.88 US) two times per day. Purchase price: 160,000 SEK ($20,056 US). Total monthly cost: 5530 SEK ($693US).
In another example, an owner of a Volvo V70 2.4 140 HK with a purchase price of 250,000 SEK ($31,340 US) will pay 85,410 SEK ($10,708) per year. Per month it will cost the owner 7230 SEK ($906) to drive the Volvo, congestion tax and all. Göran Jaxéus, Managing Director at Taxi Stockholm, naturally hopes that the increased cost will cause Stockholm commuters to consider using taxis and other collective transportation options.
"Taxis are stereotyped as being somewhat of a luxury, but with the increase in fees I think that this label will eventually fade. Many people have a second car, and when they compare the cost to own and maintain it, a taxi is a clear alternative."
The study also compares the cost of those who trade-in their Golf-style car for a transit pass and 24 taxi rides per month (10km per trip). If the former auto owner decides to rent a car for a weekend, the cost savings still allow 16 taxi trips in addition to the transit pass.
The owner of the Volvo, or similar style car, has a budget for a transit pass and 32 taxi trips per month. If he or she decides to rent a car with unlimited miles for a weekend, there is still enough left for 24 taxi trips. Again, this is all based on paying the congestion tax with other auto-related costs.
However, Ylva Yngveson doesn't believe that Stockholm residents are going to lose the car at first, despite the cost increases. "Another study we did several years ago showed that people would more likely change jobs, work more or move in order to maintain a budget for their car. People love their cars."
Leif Aspelin
08-13 51 41, leif.aspelin@svd.se
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Italian Bullet Trains Open to Private Competitor - May 02, 2012
- How Public Protest Kept the Car From Taking Over Copenhagen and Amsterdam - Apr 28, 2012
- Do Compact Cities Dream of Electric Cars? - Apr 09, 2012
- Europe's Largest Civil Engineering Project - Mar 26, 2012
- Moscow Cyclists Doing it for Themselves - Feb 24, 2012




















88 Cents Per Mile
The costs work out to 88 cents per mile. About 50% more than the cost per vehicle mile here in the US for similar circumstances. That's hardly enough to change behavior.
thanks for clarification
Yes, it is indeed a congestion charge, not a commuter tax that is charged to all suburban commuters regardless of modal commute.
I appreciate your translation, and I find the article to be optimistic...perhaps congestion pricing of central cities will catch on in 2006?!
Irvin Dawid, Palo Alto, CA
clarification is needed: commuter OR congestion tax?
The summary uses both terms, and of course, they are very different. In fact, Mayor Blumberg OPPOSES congestion charging (a la London style IN FAVOR of a commuter tax!)
see link at end of: http://www.planetizen.com/node/17977
Unfortunately, you'll only see the summary as it's dated....
Irvin Dawid, Palo Alto, CA
Here is more clarification
Thanks for the clarification. The misuse of terms in the article (it was not a summary but was rather a translation of the article in its entirety) was due to my being too liberal in my translation. The article uses the term "trängselskatt". According to the online dictionary of the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, "trängsel" is translated as meaning "crowding" in general and in reference to internet usage it means "net congestion". "Skatt" means "tax" or "duty". Incidentally it can also mean "treasure" or "riches" or "wealth". Based on this information, the most accurate translation is likely "congestion tax" and should have been used consistently in the article.
As I understand, trängselskatten will start January 3rd on a trial basis. How long, I have not yet learned. Trängselskatt is charged at stations at all routes in and out of the inner city. The charge changes during predetermined intervals between the hours of 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM but is the same in the respective time interval (it doesn't vary based on levels of congestion like an access point to a HOT lane in CA). Most people will pay using a transponder. I assume this will be similar to the Fast Toll on the I-95 corridor. Regardless of a driver's usage of a transponder or not, there are cameras at each station that will take pictures of every license plate. Bills are then sent to the registered owners of cars that have passed through without paying the trängselskatt.
I hope that provides some clarification. Thanks for reading and responding to the article.
Carl
Driving Costs Escalate in Stockholm
And this is a BAD thing?
We need something like this in the good ol' US of A!