The Two Sides Of Waste Management

23 October 2005 - 5:00am

An editorial sifts through the differences between Integrated Waste Management and Zero Waste.

"Sheehan and Spiegelman note that the municipal solid waste management system was established a century ago to protect public health but evolved in such a way that it provided an indirect subsidy to the "throwaway society," collecting (at taxpayer expense) all the detritus of the consumer culture and making it "go away." Rather than proselytize ordinary people to recycle more (an IWM habit), Sheehan and Spiegelman instead suggest that corporations and consumers are behaving in a rational way. With no price connection between production and disposal, it's predictable that industry would shift over the past half century toward the manufacture of expedient, disposable products, often made from non-renewable materials and energy. (A disposable plastic razor is a good example, as is a "recyclable" plastic soft-drink container.)"

Full Story: Zeroing in on Waste
Source: GreenBiz, October 22, 2005
Bookmark and Share
"To ignore this space is shortsighted." -- Jennifer Wolch, Director of the USC Center for Sustainable Cities