The Two Sides Of Waste Management
An editorial sifts through the differences between Integrated Waste Management and Zero Waste.
"Sheehan and Spiegelman note that the municipal solid waste management system was established a century ago to protect public health but evolved in such a way that it provided an indirect subsidy to the "throwaway society," collecting (at taxpayer expense) all the detritus of the consumer culture and making it "go away." Rather than proselytize ordinary people to recycle more (an IWM habit), Sheehan and Spiegelman instead suggest that corporations and consumers are behaving in a rational way. With no price connection between production and disposal, it's predictable that industry would shift over the past half century toward the manufacture of expedient, disposable products, often made from non-renewable materials and energy. (A disposable plastic razor is a good example, as is a "recyclable" plastic soft-drink container.)"
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- America's Third World Infrastructure - Feb 03, 2012
- Exploring the Art of Wayfinding - Feb 01, 2012
- A Paradigm Shift in Urban Runoff - Jan 30, 2012
- Understanding the Water-Energy Nexus - Jan 29, 2012
- Parsing the State of the Union Address for Planners - Jan 25, 2012


















