Housing In 'Smart Growth' Cities: Is It Really Worth The Cost?

Randal O'Toole argues that stringent land use regulations in "Smart Growth" areas translate into higher housing prices. Do these costs reflect greater livability or limited opportunity?

1 minute read

August 26, 2002, 6:00 AM PDT

By Chris Steins @planetizen

"Defenders of land-use planning argue that planning makes cities more livable, so naturally they would be more desirable and thus housing would be more expensive. But is Portland really more livable than Albuquerque? Or Oakland more livable than Las Vegas? San Francisco is a fun place to visit, but is it really four times more livable than Phoenix?"

Thanks to Chris Steins

FULL STORY: Housing in 'Smart Growth' Cities: Is It Really Worth The Cost?

Monday, August 26, 2002 in Planetizen

Housing United States

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Use Code 25for25 at checkout for 25% off an annual plan!

Get 25% Off Your Subscription

Advertise with us

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.