Although suburbs with college campuses are often eager to zone out students, this sort of exclusionary zoning has its own negative side effects.
In Long Island where I teach, colleges and universities are engaged in a dorm-building boom—partially to attract out-of-town students, but partially because zoning rules often prevent student-oriented off-campus housing such as apartments and group houses.
The Supreme Court has upheld such zoning ordinances; in a 1974 decision upholding one Long Island suburb's right to exclude group houses, Justice Douglas wrote:
A quiet place where yards are wide, people few, and motor vehicles restricted are legitimate guidelines in a land-use project addressed to family needs...It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people.
Justice Douglas's decision to use "youth values" as a reason to exclude college students seems a bit bizarre to me. Nevertheless, such restrictive zoning is understandable; I suspect that the middle-aged suburban homeowners believe that college-age students are far too likely to get drunk, drive recklessly, or have noisy parties (or worse still, do all three at the same time). Moreover, high car insurance premiums for college-age drivers suggest that this prejudice is rooted in empirical reality.
On the other hand, anti-student zoning creates its own problems. If students don't have any place to live near a college, they have to commute to the college. And in the automobile-dependent suburbs of Long Island, this usually means lots of driving. So ironically, a zoning strategy designed to create places where (in Justice Douglas's words) "motor vehicles [are] restricted" in fact may create traffic jams and pollution near universities.
As noted above, on-campus housing may well solve this problem, by allowing students to get to school without driving. This strategy may work well in the long run, especially if students do not bring cars to the dormitories with them. However, a municipality cannot always rely on a university's willingness to build dormitories, since dorm construction requires time and money.
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
Planning for Accessibility: Proximity is More Important than Mobility
Accessibility-based planning minimizes the distance that people must travel to reach desired services and activities. Measured this way, increased density can provide more total benefits than increased speeds.
Fair Housing Cannot Take a Back Seat to ‘Build, Baby, Build’
If we overlook fair housing principles in the plan to build US housing back better, we risk ending up right back where we started.
LA Metro Board Approves New 710 Freeway Plan
The newest plan for the 710 corridor claims it will not displace any residents.
Austin’s Proposed EV Charging Rules Regulate Station Locations, Size
City planners say the new rules would ensure an efficient distribution of charging infrastructure across the city and prevent an overconcentration in residential areas.
Making California State Parks More Climate-Resilient
A recently released report offers recommendations for keeping state parks healthy and robust, including acquiring additional land for conservation and recreation.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Write for Planetizen
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.