San Diego County's "most walkable city" is being challenged to identify the real smart growth: what it has or what is being proposed. At issue: a plan amendment for a high density project near transit. But is the project real?
Identifying a project as "smart growth" can be a powerful argument for relief from local zoning restrictions and plans, notes land use attorney Bill Adams. While density, proximity to transit, and other physical attributes help determine whether a project is "smart," should communities consider a much more preliminary, non bricks and mortar, question? Adams looks at a proposal in his own neighborhood:
"The “Village” area of the City of La Mesa remains a sleepy hamlet nestled among foothills despite having been enveloped on all sides by suburban sprawl and freeways. With its traditional main street and railway stop, it’s a rarity in Southern California. It has been recognized as the most walkable city in San Diego County. However, the way the Village views itself is being fundamentally challenged.
"Recently, the main topic of conversation in La Mesa has been a large mixed use development proposal . . . If built as proposed, it will include the city’s tallest building at 9-11 stories (110 feet). Current buildings adjacent to the site are 1 – 2 story detached residences and retail buildings. . . existing zoning allows retail and multifamily housing up to a height of 46 feet, i.e., 4 – 5 stories – a significant bump in density." Adams writes that the project proponents tout its 'smartness' due to its proximity to a light rail line and its density. However, he goes on to observe,
"Questions concerning spot zoning, sprawl, and impacts on the surrounding neighborhood are garnering the most, if not all, the attention concerning the Park Station proposal. However another question is circulating . . . Is this a real project? Or is it a trojan horse?"
Adams looks at a number of factors, especially those pertaining to financing the project, to determine whether the project has a realistic chance of being built as proposed. He also discusses the consequences of approving variances and plan amendments for unrealistic proposals. He concludes that determining the reality of a project being built as proposed may be as important to "smart growth" as the physical form of the project, especially when a community is being asked to grant variances or amend its plans or codes.
FULL STORY: When is a “Smart Growth” Project a “Trojan Horse”? – Park Station as a case study.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.

Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail
The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.

Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power
Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.

MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns
MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.

Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant
A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
City of Fort Worth
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie