Cal Supremes Decide Whether Inclusionary Housing is a Regulation or Exaction

In a decision that may have far-reaching impacts, California's Supreme Court ruled last week that the City of Palo Alto's inclusionary housing requirement is an exaction rather than a land use regulation, reports William Fulton.

"The California Supreme Court has ruled that an inclusionary housing requirement is an exaction rather than a land use regulation – a distinction that means inclusionary housing could be judged by the same nexus and proportionality requirements as other exactions,"

"The Supreme Court did not decide the merits of the case, in which [developer] Sterling Park challenged [Palo Alto's] inclusionary housing ordinance as an impermissible use of the city’s power to impose exactions in exchange for land-use permits," notes Fulton. "Instead, it remanded the case to the Sixth District Court of Appeal for that decision."

"However, the Supreme Court’s ruling certainly sets the stage for a possible ruling that would outlaw or significantly rein in  inclusionary housing ordinances. Under exaction law, a jurisdiction seeing to impose an inclusionary housing requirement on a developer would have to prove a strong nexus between the construction of the project and the need for affordable housing."


Full Story: Inclusionary Housing Must Be Litigated As Exaction, Cal Supremes Rule

Comments

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $16.95 a month

Stay thirsty, urbanists

These sturdy water bottles are eco-friendly and perfect for urbanists on the go.
$19.00
Woman wearing city map tote bag

City Shoulder Totes - New Cities Added!

Durable CityFabric© shoulder tote bags available from 9 different cities.
$22.00