SB 4 passed the legislature over strong objections from the oil and business community. California will go from having no well stimulation (includes acidizing) regulation set in statute to the nation's toughest, so why are environmentalists unhappy?
California's fracking debate, which we noted here in February, appears to be coming to an end. Marc Lifsher writes that state Senator Fran Pavley's bill, which "would give California the nation's toughest [fracking] regulation...had widespread support from most environmental groups, but some of them withdrew their endorsement just before the Assembly vote Wednesday (Sept. 11)."
Lifsher's newspaper, the Los Angeles Times, explains why they withdrew their own support for the bill in their Sept. 12 editorial as a result of amendments made on Sept. 6. that are analyzed here.
In recent amendments, the key regulatory element of the bill was so weakened that it is no longer recognizable...[T]he bill now could exclude many fracking projects from meaningful environmental review. The amendments have led various environmental organizations to withdraw their support. We previously endorsed the bill, and Pavley deserves praise for trying, but at this point SB 4 is so flawed that it would be better to kill it and press for more serious legislation next year.
Lifsher writes that's not likely to happen. "The bill now goes to Gov. Jerry Brown, who said Wednesday that he would sign it into law."
While some environmentalists were upset with the recent changes, the oil industry has consistently "opposed the bill, arguing it would make it harder for them to exploit the estimated 15 billion barrels of oil in the Monterey Shale Formation in the southern San Joaquin Valley" [and the largest shale oil reserves in the nation], writes Lifsher. Their opposition contributed to the defeat of stronger bills that imposed moratoriums, explaining in part why "only Senate Bill 4 remains", writes Capitol Alert's Jeremy B. White.
I still believe that a moratorium is the best way to go with respect to fracking," said Assemblyman Richard Bloom, D-Santa Monica, "but this bill is the next best alternative."
Grist blogger, John Upton, writes, "Environmentalists who had cautiously supported the bill, which many described as flawed, have turned into vociferous opponents. The East Bay Express explains":
Last week, after intense backroom lobbying, the powerful oil and gas industry convinced state Senator Fran Pavley of Los Angeles... to further weaken her legislation and include poison-pill amendments. If enacted, it promises to do more harm than good.
The amendments included how the Calif. Environmental Quality Act is applied to well stimulation as interpreted by the Department of Conservation's Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources.
The Environmental Defense Center did not withdraw their support for the bill, according to the legislative analysis, acknowledging that California "lags far behind other major oil and gas producing states...SB 4 would remedy this unacceptable status quo."
White doesn't appear so certain that Jerry Brown will sign the bill.
The governor has a precarious relationship with environmentalists, some of whom accuse him of being overly lenient with the energy industry, so his decision will come under heavy scrutiny.
Read the full story: California Legislature passes fracking regulation bill
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority