Are Amoeba-Shaped Cities More Likely To Go Bankrupt?

Recently, it’s been suggested that the collapse of the Ponzi scheme of spending and taxing inherent in sprawling development patterns may be responsible for pushing municipalities to the brink of bankruptcy. Ariel Godwin applies a quantitative analysis to examine whether there is, in fact, a correlation between city form and expenditures.

A CNN article recently featured on Planetizen discussed the question of whether sprawling development - and the infrastructure costs associated with it - places a strain on municipal budgets and drives some municipalities to bankruptcy. To what extent, the article asks, is sprawl responsible for these fiscal problems?

There are several ways in which this question could be tackled through quantitative analysis. One entertaining - and perhaps instructive - method is to compare the relative convolutedness of a city's boundary to its municipal expenditures.

Consider the simple shapes of the "ideal cities" conceived throughout history. Imperial cities in ancient China were generally square or rectangular (Schinz, 1996; Steinhardt, 1999). Sforzinda, conceived by a 15th-century duke of Milan (but never built), would have had the shape of an eight-pointed star (Hub, 2011, p. 20) (see Figure 1). Ebenezer Howard's Garden Cities were designed in circular patterns (Fishman, 1982) (see Figure 2). These ideal cities were intended to be not only beautiful in form, but also efficient in function.


Figure 1. Design for the ideal city of Sforzinda
Image Source: User Rainer Zenz on de.wikipedia [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons


Figure 2. Ebenezer Howard's Garden City
Image source: Ebenezer Howard, Garden Cities of Tomorrow (London: S. Sonnenschein & Co., 1902), via Wikimedia Commons

The typical modern American city is shaped like an amoeba extending multiple pseudopods (see Figure 3). While some cities are constrained into an odd shape by natural barriers, many of these amoebic municipalities have been shaped by annexation (see Figure 4).


Figure 3. Amoebas extending pseudopods
Image source: Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg, Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen (Leipzig, 1830), via Wikimedia Commons


Figure 4. Select cities in Florida with "pseudopods"
(map by Ariel Godwin)

Annexation in itself does not drive sprawl, and sprawl is an issue of the density of development rather than the shape of a city boundary. However, there are some connections between annexation, city boundaries, and sprawl. For example, a city that annexes land aggressively may encourage low-density development by making city services available on cheap land far from the city center. This effect is particularly visible in cities that strategically annex large tracts of land in order to capture potential development or compete with other cities. Aggressive annexation often results in a convoluted city boundary, and newly annexed land does not always generate the needed revenue, and can become a strain on municipal services, driving up total costs. Therefore, we ask the question: Are cities with more convoluted boundaries worse off than cities with more regular outlines? Does a municipality with more pseudopods spend more on services?

To tackle this question, this analysis uses the ratio of the city perimeter to the square root of the city's area to measure the convolutedness of a city boundary. (Using the square root is a way of controlling for city area; if we simply used the ratio of perimeter to area, the ratio would be smaller for a larger city and would not produce meaningful results). For a perfectly square city, the ratio will be 4, because the perimeter of a square is four times the square root of its area. The more convoluted the perimeter is, the higher the ratio will be. Figure 5 shows two cities typical of each extreme: quadrangular Reddick, Florida has a perimeter-to-square-root-of-area ratio of 4.1, while amoebic Wildwood, Florida has a ratio of 22.4.


Figure 5. Convoluted and Non-Convoluted Cities
(Map by Ariel Godwin)

This analysis compares the perimeter-to-square-root-of-area ratio to per capita municipal government expenditures and revenues for all municipalities in Florida, as reported by the Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research, for the local fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2009 (the most recent year for which an entire statewide dataset was available). I chose Florida for this analysis because of the aggressive annexation policies pursued by many of its municipalities (Fl. Senate, 2003, p. 2) and because the large number of municipalities in the state allows for a broader analysis (411 municipalities are included in this study). Municipal perimeters and areas were calculated from a GIS dataset downloaded from the Florida Geographic Data Library.

What types of municipal expenditure are most strongly correlated with this perimeter-to-square-root-of-area ratio? Table 1 shows the top ten.

Table 1. Strongest Correlations, Per Capita Expenditures

Account

Correlation

Special Recreation Facilities

0.26

Fire Control

0.22

Libraries

0.21

Garbage / Solid Waste Control Services

0.20

Pension Benefits

0.19

Sewer / Wastewater Services

0.18

Inter-Fund Group Transfers Out

0.17

Protective Inspections

0.15

Public Assistance Services

0.11

Proprietary - Other Non-Operating Disbursements

0.11

 

Of course, more annexed land can mean more tax revenue, and some categories of municipal revenues correlate with the perimeter-to-square-root-of-area ratio too. Table 2 shows the ten revenue categories with the strongest correlations:

Table 2. Strongest Correlations, Per Capita Revenues

Account

Correlation

Insurance Premium Tax for Firefighters' Pension

0.26

Special Assessments - Capital Improvement

0.25

General Gov't (Not Court-Related) - Internal Service Fund Fees and Charges

0.24

Casualty Insurance Premium Tax for Police Firefighters' Retirement

0.23

Physical Environment - Garbage / Solid Waste

0.23

Fines - Library

0.22

Culture / Recreation - Parks and Recreation

0.22

Culture / Recreation - Libraries

0.20

Proceeds of General Capital Asset Dispositions - Compensation for Loss

0.20

State Shared Revenues - General Gov't - Local Gov't Half-Cent Sales Tax

0.19


These are not very strong correlations, the strongest being 0.26. However, they are correlations, and they are positive (the strongest negative correlation in this analysis was only -0.10). Some correlations are of more interest than others. For this analysis, I was less interested in municipal expenditures on facilities that are used by people both inside and outside the municipality-such as libraries and parks-and more interested in essential services that are closely tied to annexation and are generally used only by municipality residents, such as sewer, water, and garbage services. Thus, it is significant that fire control, solid waste, and sewer services are all in the top ten list shown in Table 1. It is worth speculating here that costs tied directly to infrastructure-such as water and sewer services-might be inherently lower for a geometrically shaped city, where such systems could be planned and engineered more efficiently. Conversely, a convoluted city would require more convoluted infrastructure, at least in theory.

What can we conclude from this? There are plenty of less abstract ways to compare municipal governments to one another in terms of efficiency. Perimeter-to-square-root-of-area ratios seem unlikely to find their way into policymaking or to be used to inform annexation decisions. However, this analysis seems to validate the idea that as urban planners, we are sometimes right to give special consideration and thought to the shape and form of a city. Even in the case of arbitrary political boundaries, shape and form can sometimes have measurable effects.

We can only learn so much from analyzing the geometric shape of city boundaries. However, this analysis could form a background for further research examining the costs and benefits of annexation in more detail. Future research could examine municipal finances in relation to factors such as the rate at which annexation takes place; the location of annexed land with respect to potential development; or the strategic reasons for which annexation takes place.



Ariel Godwin is a planner and research analyst at the Central Florida Regional Planning Council. He has also worked as a regional transportation planner in Boston, MA and Columbus, OH. Prior to that, he worked as a freelance translator. He holds a master's degree in city and regional planning from Ohio State University.

Sources

Fishman, Robert (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research. "Expenditures and Revenues Reported by Florida's Municipal Governments." http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/local-government/data/revenues-expenditures/munifiscal.cfm (retrieved June 17, 2012).

Hub, Berthold (2011). Foundation, Dedication and Consecration in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill.

Schinz, Alfred (1996). The Magic Square: Cities in Ancient China. Fellbach: Axel Menges.

Steinhardt, Nancy Shatzman (1999). Chinese Imperial City Planning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Florida Senate (2003). Interim Project Report 2003-115: "Does Current Law Adequately Address Delivery of Local Government Service Issues and Other Conflicts That Arise During Annexation?" http://archive.flsenate.gov/data/Publications/2003/Senate/reports/interim_reports/pdf/2003-115ca.pdf (retrieved June 17, 2012).

Comments

Book cover of the Guide to Graduate Planning Programs 4th Edition

Thinking about Grad School?

New! 4th Edition of the Planetizen Guide to Graduate Urban Planning Programs just released.
Starting at $24.95

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $209
Wood necklace with city map

City Necklaces

These sweet pendants are engraved on a cedar charm with a mini map of selected cities. The perfect gift for friends and family or yourself!
$28.00
Book cover of Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Featuring thought-provoking commentary and insights from some of the leading thinkers and practitioners in the field.
$18.95