Recent articles on uncomfortably loud environments in New York and Los Angeles raise an interesting question - is noise pollution a necessary part of city living or is it a health hazard that should be addressed?
The rise in attention to the impact of noise pollution on those living and working in America's biggest cities was kicked off by an article that appeared on July 19 in The New York Times detailing what reporters found when they measured noise levels at 37 restaurants, bars, stores and gyms across
the city. According to reporter Cara Buckley, "loud noise has become a fact of life in the very places where people have traditionally sought respite from urban stress" and from the sampling of establishments that The Times visited, reporters "found [noise] levels that experts said bordered on dangerous at
one-third of them."
A couple of days after the article was published, Michael Kimmelman, architecture critic for The Times, addressed the noise issue on his twitter feed: "Still shocked since returning to NY by noise pollution--subways, sirens,
restaurants. Not a sign of big city grit, but an urban blight." The next day he tweeted a follow-up, "Why is NY so glorious on summer weekends? Partly the quiet. Noise pollution is the next ecological challenge for the city."
More recently Nate Berg has published two pieces in The Atlantic Cities focused on the impact of noise on transit commuters and outdoor concertgoers in Los Angeles.
Do these articles represent a newfound sensitivity to the sounds of the city as more people embrace urban living, or a profound shift in the decibel levels city dwellers are inundated with on a daily basis? Will urban Americans raise their voices in protest of an emerging public health hazard, or will the concerns identified by the authors above be lost amongst the din of the urban news cycle?
Read the full story: For L.A. Residents Fed Up With Helicopter Noise, a Final Straw
Learning loss and urban schools, part 2
Did test scores in progressive cities drop more post-COVID than test scores in moderate ones?
Flood Resilience Through Green Infrastructure
Cities like New York and Los Angeles are moving to build green infrastructure as the need for spongier urban spaces becomes more apparent.
Berkeley Noise Pollution Precedent Blocks Los Angeles Housing
Opponents to a new university housing project cited a recent Berkeley case in which noise pollution was successfully used to deny an exemption from environmental review.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Housing is the top priority of Seattle’s sole new councilmember
Jenks campaigned on building 1,000 new units of affordable housing.
New tax cuts may slash $1.5 billion in funding for Miami transit, public parks
Amendment 3 will save Miami-Dade homeowners $2,700 in 2028.
Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania hope to finally advance climate goals post-midterms
The three states have spent years under Republican or divided control.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority