Yesterday, the controversial plan to expand New York University's footprint in Greenwich Village over the next 20 years was approved by a City Council committee after last minute negotiations and reductions, reports Joseph Berger.
NYU's controversial 2031 expansion plan came up before the City Council's Land Use Committee on Tuesday, and came away with a 19 to 1 victory, "all but assuring that the city will give the university the go-ahead to proceed with its much-debated development," declares Berger. Under pressure from Margaret Chin, who represents Greenwich Village, NYU agreed to further reductions in building sizes, and promised to preserve more parkland and create more communal spaces, after late night and early morning negotiations. "The changes amount to a 26 percent reduction in space from N.Y.U.'s original plan," notes Berger.
In The New York Observer, Matt Chaban reports on the vocal, if late in the game, opposition to the plan by one key stakeholder group - NYU faculty. According to Chaban, "36 departments or divisions at the university have come out
against the plan," led by Mark Crispin
Miller, a media and culture professor. The group released an alternative plan on the same day as the council vote, arguing, "that NYU only needs a fraction of the space it is
proposing because little of what is being initially built-only 18
percent in the first of four towers-is for academic uses."
While the faculty plan came late in the five-year planning process, the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, led by executive director Andrew Berman, have raised consistent objections to the plan for the duration of the process.
"In a statement, Mr. Berman called the Land Use Committee's approval 'a
slap in the face to the thousands of area residents and the countless
N.Y.U. faculty and staff workers who called for the plan to be voted
down.'"
"We will take this battle to the full Council," he added, "and possibly beyond."
FULL STORY: N.Y.U. Expansion Plan Wins Key Vote of Council Panel

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

Cal Fire Chatbot Fails to Answer Basic Questions
An AI chatbot designed to provide information about wildfires can’t answer questions about evacuation orders, among other problems.

What Happens if Trump Kills Section 8?
The Trump admin aims to slash federal rental aid by nearly half and shift distribution to states. Experts warn this could spike homelessness and destabilize communities nationwide.

Sean Duffy Targets Rainbow Crosswalks in Road Safety Efforts
Despite evidence that colorful crosswalks actually improve intersection safety — and the lack of almost any crosswalks at all on the nation’s most dangerous arterial roads — U.S. Transportation Secretary Duffy is calling on states to remove them.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie