On the Ethos of City Branding: Or, Trying versus Being
As Cleveland takes on yet another effort in "rebranding", Richey Piiparinen looks at past schemes and finds it's better to keep it real.
To Piiparinen, there are two ways to brand a city, by marketing it aspirationally or realistically. Or, to put it another way, "the success of any city brand campaign is dependent on how you go about it, that is: are you trying to be a thing or are you being it? The distinction is important, as nobody likes a fake, especially when the “brand” of the Rust Belt is about being as real as possible."
With this distinction in mind, Piiparinen goes about providing some examples of past Cleveland branding campaigns with illustrative examples for each. Take the, apparently messy, "Cleveland's A Plum" aspirational campaign. Or the much better regarded "Cleveland You’ve Got to Be Tough!" saying.
Although Piiparinen concludes, "that trying method, it’s been tried—over and over and over. And it has never succeeded in changing how people look at us—let alone how Cleveland looks at itself," he's pessimistic that "corporate-backed, tax payer-funded branding efforts would embrace more of the underground being approach."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Cleveland Turns Its Focus Uptown - Dec 21, 2011
- The Plusses and Minuses of the Cleveland Casino - Nov 03, 2011
- Developers in Downtown, Cleveland are Turning to the Slots to Appeal to a New Crowd - Oct 18, 2011
- Extreme Makeover: Housing Policies Edition - Aug 28, 2011
- Place Overpowers Bunkers in Cleveland's Post-9/11 Projects - Aug 19, 2011


















