Rethinking Rural Development

Silos and smokestacks are the way of the past for rural area development, according to economist Mark Drabenstott who offers a new idea for bringing economic activity to rural places.

In this article for The Daily Yonder, Drabenstott argues that small rural towns have for too long competed with each other to lure new jobs. He says they should start to take a regional approach and work together.

"The rural Midwest could have an economic future as bright as its vibrant past. But it is basing its twenty-first-century future on a twentieth-century playbook. This is not a recipe for success. Towns and counties compete with neighboring towns and counties for jobs and investments. Industrial recruitment-"smokestack chasing"-is the norm. Economic development agencies spend millions on infrastructure and tax breaks to lure companies from afar instead of creating new jobs at home. Boosters sell the rural Midwest as a cheap place to make things, ignoring the region's many other economic assets-its natural resources, its hard-working people, its central location, its schools and universities, and its scientific base, among others -that could all be leveraged into a competitive new economy.

The path to stronger economies in the rural Midwest is plain. Partnering regionally to compete globally is what's needed. This pathway will lead to scores of multicounty, self-defined regions across the Midwest. Only by combining their forces to create new businesses and good jobs at home will the towns and counties of the rural Midwest compete and thrive in a global economy where this sort of collaboration is fast becoming the norm."

Full Story: Past Silos and Smokestacks: A Rural Development Proposal

Comments

Comments

Competing domestically

I agree with the notion of regional cooperation and planning, but I don't think we should be continuing the idea that our communities must compete globally. This perspective can shape our domestic policies in negative ways.

Presently, Obama is using "global economic competiveness" as his rationale for extending the school day and year, as one example.

We should be focusing on building local sustainable economyies and domestic economic policies that keep jobs and purchasing in the US.

Competeing domestically

I agree with you whole heartedly. I don't think that we should be worrying about our rural areas competeing Globally. We need to keep things local as much as we can.

Yes, visit www.livingeconomies.org

Yes, visit Business Alliance for Local Living Economies at www.livingeconomies.org

Regions across the country are forming city, suburban and rural sustainable economy/living organizations, to promote thriving local economies.

In addition to this on the ground work, we have to demand national economic policy that keeps our domestic economy thriving- as opposed to outsourcing jobs and importing products we can make well here.

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $14.95 a month
Book cover of Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Contemporary Debates in Urban Planning

Featuring thought-provoking commentary and insights from some of the leading thinkers and practitioners in the field.
$18.95
Red necktie with map of Boston

Tie one on to celebrate your city

Choose from over 20 styles of neckties imprinted with detailed city or transit maps.
$44.95