The Historic Costs of Going Green

23 February 2010 - 1:00pm

Preservationists say a new California law that requires new construction to meet stringent green building standards could encourage demolition of historically significant buildings.

California's first-in-the-nation statewide green building standards code has only been on the books for two months. But historic preservationists say mandatory reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and water use don't take into account the value of upgrading old buildings.

This is particularly an issue from the context of LEED certification, says Linda Dishman, executive director of the Los Angeles Conservancy. She tells NPR's Ethan Lindsey "If you save a historic building, you can get up to three points, but if you use recycled carpet, you get one point. Is saving a whole building really the same as recycled carpet?"

Dishman claims old buildings are greener than new ones because of "embodied energy," or how much energy goes into construction. Historic preservationists are working with U.S. Green Building Council's LEED team to up their points and promote other building standards that weigh preservation more heavily.

Developers say in the end what matters to buyers is cost: whether a building is green or preserved is a second priority.

Source: NPR, February 23, 2010

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

We need green AND historic preservation

This is one of those problems that needs to be negated. Clearly, both greener buildings AND historic preservation are very important. Historic buildings shouldn't be demolished because of new building regs.

Let's get real- mass produced subdivisions and poorly made, disposable goods are what is sucking up vast amoungs of energy in the US, not a small number of well built, albeit sometimes less energy efficient historic buildings.

Bookmark and Share
These practices are also inequitable since they force non-drivers to subsidize parking costs, reduce travel options for non-drivers, and reduce housing affordability.