The Future of American High Speed Rail: Regional and Slow

Robert Goodspeed's picture
Blogger

During his dramatic presentation last April, President Barack Obama laid out a bold vision for high speed rail in America. Wielding a stylish red, white, and blue map (below) he presented the proposed corridors for new high speed trains. (Similar, if not identical, to plans long sitting on the shelf at the Federal Railway Administration.) He asked Americans to "Imagine whisking through towns at speeds over 100 miles an hour, walking only a few steps to public transportation, and ending up just blocks from your destination." In reality limited funds, our dysfunctional planning processes, and the historical lack of investment in rail will mean the U.S. will most likely end up with a diverse collection of regional rail systems that may not go that fast.

rail_map_blog.jpg (JPEG Image, 525x394 pixels)Americans that have visited Europe or Asia have likely experienced modern high speed rail systems. France's TGV system, the product of decades of upgrades and improvements to the existing passenger rail system, now extends from the Chunnel to Marseille by way of Paris. Spain's rapidly growing AVE train network is credited by the Guardian with transforming traditionally provincial Spanish society with trains topping out at over 180 mph. China is famously pursuing an aggressive plan to expand their high speed rail network. Siemens considers the new service inaugurated between Moscow and St. Petersburg in Russia a testing ground for technology they hope to sell in America, which the Siemens spokesman quipped is "like a developing country in terms of rail" during an on-board interview with the New York Times.

Will our system look anything like these? The answer, as transportation wonks already know, is no. Even the $8 billion appropriated by the stimulus is a small portion of the funds required to implement even a portion of Obama's plan. This became painfully obvious at a briefing sponsored by the Rappaport Institute I attended recently, where Federal Railway Administration Administrator Karen Rae described how they viewed the $8 billion a modest sum to invest strategically in the rail network, sometimes for trains running well below Obama's 100 mph goal. She presented this sobering illustration of the historical investment in passenger rail, compared with other intercity modes:

Final FRA HSR Strat Plan.pdf

In fact, the High Speed Rail Strategic Plan released in April includes not only new high speed service with top speeds over 150 mph, but also investment in "emerging and regional" services with top speeds of 90-110 mph, and upgrade reliability and services on "conventional" intercity rail services with speeds up to 79-90 mph. In response to the ARRA call for proposals, the Federal Railway Administration announced in October they received an "overwhelming" 45 applications, saying they would delay announcement of winners beyond the announced goal of November to sometime "this winter."

What high speed rail should Americans expect? With significant bond funds approved by voters and serious planning underway, the California high speed rail plans seem a likely recipient of some of the funds. The Chicago region, with engaged stakeholders and a rich tradition of rail is another likely candidate.

Despite hopefully boosters, the other corridors, such as Pacific Northwest, Florida, New England, and Texas, seem less likely for high speed rail in the near future. Despite political leaders who don't want to be left out in cities in Arizona or Utah, Rae mentioned another important variable to a reporter in October: "We're not going to build rails to nowhere." In addition to having a local plan, high speed rail will work best when it can integrate with cities with well developed public transit networks at either end. Transportation planners know the "last mile" connections can play a critical role in determining whether riders will choose rail over other options -- such as driving or flying. 

Ironically, the California system is demonstrating the biggest problems for high speed rail in the U.S. may not be our lack of technical knowledge but our troubled infrastructure planning and delivery system. Disputes about alignments in California have already spawned lawsuits. Maybe beyond ogling their trains, we should study how our foreign counterparts resolve conflicts about system design. In one case study I read about planning a TGV line in France, the government convened a "debate" bringing together the stakeholders before choosing an alignment or other technical details. In the U.S. on the other hand, government agencies act both as project designers and boosters, relegating other stakeholders to reactionary roles as outsiders who rely on lawsuits to pursue their interests. In addition, our government agencies are also lacking in competent planners and administrators who specialize in rail. In the end, dysfunctional planning processes and weak planning capacity may result in avoidable cost overruns. Overcoming these obstacles may prove even more challenging than finding the historically elusive political will.

Robert Goodspeed is a PhD student at the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning.

Comments

Comments

America - 3rd World High Speed Rail Nation

Your statement about someone's calling America 3rd World in terms of High Speed Rail could not be more spot on. Instead of a one-time $8 + $5B allotment, we ought to be spending $16B per year on HSR and the same on Urban Rail Transit. By comparing rail to federal spending on modes of transportation from your chart, we are woefully underfunding on Intercity Passenger Rail (should I assume this includes commuter rail?).

For the life of me, I don't understand why Highway spending must remain so high, when the Interstate Freeway System and major highways are essentially built out. Take Los Angeles where I live for example. LA has one incomplete 3.5 mile tunnel section of I-710 Freeway, but organized citizens have successfully fought against it for decades. If it gets approved, watch how miraculously $10-12B will appear to fast-track this project. Meanwhile overpasses, track and signaling improvements that would help Amtrak and Commuter Rail in LA are massively underfunded. Its as though some powerful interest group wants more train-auto-people accidents to argue against passenger rail funding. The situation is just as bad for heavy rail transit system which nicely connects one line to Union Station with Amtrak, Light Rail, and Commuter Rail systems. Even though the heavy rail line from Downtown to Hollywood to Universal Studios is breaking records for patronage, the current west-bound Heavy Rail line is like an amputated stub on its Mid-Wilshire stop, when in fact the HeavyRail line should support the 3rd densest office corridor in the nation (Mid-Wilshire, Miracle Mile, Beverly Hills, Century City, Westwood, West LA, Santa Monica). Until then, local politicians lard up on billions of dollars of lane additions, sound walls and beautification projects as we putter turtle-like to sub-20 mph rush hour speeds.

All of this would be empty sarcasm, if the stakes weren't so high as you state and I expand upon. This article was written by me shortly before Obama's April 2009 HSR funding announcement, http://soulofamerica.com/interact/us-cities/interstate-acela-network.

Considering the political minefield Obama and Biden had to navigate in 2009, we're fortunate that $13B is going towards HSR. Lets keep more pressure on Congress, State and local officials to step up funding for HSR and Transit/Commuter Rail.

Thomas Dorsey

Prepare for the AICP Exam

Join the thousands of students who have utilized the Planetizen AICP* Exam Preparation Class to prepare for the American Planning Association's AICP* exam.
Starting at $199
Planetizen Courses image ad

Planetizen Courses

Advance your career with subscription-based online courses tailored to the urban planning professional.
Starting at $16.95 a month
Red necktie with map of Boston

Tie one on to celebrate your city

Choose from over 20 styles of neckties imprinted with detailed city or transit maps.
$44.95

Stay thirsty, urbanists

These sturdy water bottles are eco-friendly and perfect for urbanists on the go.
$19.00