Beaterbikonomics: Owning (And Occasional Theft Of) A Bike Is Way Cheaper Than Transit

Mon, 04/06/2009 - 09:35

Pains of an imminent NYC transit fare hike and a recent article in the New York Times on bike theft/vandalism defeatism inspired me to validate the overwhelming perceived economic benefits of commuting by bike versus transit, despite the occasional theft.  If frugal is the next big thing and green is the new black, then hop on a crappy old bike if you want to be hip.  In the chart below, I compare the costs of commuting by transit assuming the regular purchase of a 30-day unlimited metro pass ($81 in NYC as of April 2009, but not for much longer) to commuting by beater-bike assuming the occasional theft.  I checked the beloved craigslist for used bicycles and determined that one can find an acceptable replacement for $150 on average (lower if you’ve got the knack).  I would say that used bikes in NYC are a bit pricey, but if you buy through a local community bike program (or start your own!) such as HoBiken in my hometown of Hoboken, NJ, you can smash this analysis.  Anyway, if you think you can manage to keep your losses to less than 5 bikes per year, surrender your metrocard and start riding:

Ian Sacs, P.E. is a transportation (not traffic) engineer based in New York City.
The views expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent the views of any group or organization that he or she is affiliated with unless clearly stated, nor the views of Planetizen.
Bookmark and Share
"In the last five years, we've been the instigators and the activists, and today a lot of our clients are demanding it," said Thom Mayne, winner of the 2005 Pritzker Prize. "We've become kind of 'green architects' all of a sudden."