Should we use zoning to preserve manufacturing?

Deindustrialization has wreaked havoc across many American cities and towns. One only need visit the landscape of the rust belt, places like Buffalo, Detroit or Flint, Michigan to get a sense how damaging this transformation can be. Behind the ugly ruins of abandoned factories and shuttered stores are the lives of real people who have suffered. Manufacturing provided jobs, good paying ones at that, that helped create a blue collar middle class.  

4 minute read

September 10, 2008, 11:59 AM PDT

By Lance Freeman


Deindustrialization has wreaked havoc across many American
cities and towns. One only need visit
the landscape of the rust belt, places like Buffalo, Detroit or Flint, Michigan
to get a sense how damaging this transformation can be. Behind the ugly ruins of abandoned factories
and shuttered stores are the lives of real people who have suffered. Manufacturing provided jobs, good paying ones
at that, that helped create a blue collar middle class.

 

It should come as no surprise then that some localities
would try to help keep manufacturing firms within their confines. A variety of strategies have been employed
including the use of land use controls such as zoning. Zoning originated in New York City as a tool
to protect wealthy landowners on the Upper East Side from the noxious pollution
emanating from the then spreading eastward factories of the garment
district. Zoning now often doubles as an
economic development tool because manufacturing zones forbid the development of
other land uses such as commercial or residential. Due to changes in technology many
manufacturing industries no longer need to be in the middle of the city. These industries can often operate more
cheaply on the outskirts of the city, in small towns or overseas. In contrast, many people want to live in the
middle of the city and many commercial enterprises need to be there too. Consequently, residential and commercial
users will typically pay more for land than manufacturing users.

 

Without government intervention commercial and residential
businesses would outbid manufacturing businesses for most urban land. By zoning land exclusively for manufacturing,
these industries are in effect being protected from competing uses.

 

Consequently, when planners plan to upzone a manufacturing
area so that other uses can operate there, many see this as the death knell of
manufacturing in these same neighborhoods.
Opponents of upzoning argue that manufacturing jobs pay well and are one
of the few remaining avenues to upward mobility for the less educated. Moreover, preserving the manufacturing base in
a city that is undergoing a shift towards service industries can be a prudent
way of maintaining a diverse economy.

 

But there are costs associated with keeping areas zoned
exclusively for manufacturing in cities like New York.
The most common counter argument is that it economically more efficient
to allow the market to determine the highest and best use of land. Households that would have lived in the
upzoned residential properties will probably seek housing in other
neighborhoods, driving up housing prices in those places. Commercial and retail establishments that
might have opened in upzoned areas may also instead locate in other
neighborhoods, driving up property costs in these other neighborhoods. Or quite
possibly, these establishments might not open at all, depriving the city of the
ensuing jobs and tax revenues.

 

The costs associated with maintaining zoning exclusively for
manufacturing do not necessarily tip the scales in favor of upzoning. If a city prefers more manufacturing to
housing, that is a political choice to make.
Using zoning as a tool to preserve manufacturing, however, makes it
difficult to see exactly what the tradeoff is.
People know that if an area is upzoned they will likely lose the
manufacturing use and gain whatever use comes in its place. But the costs associated with this decision
are not readily apparent.

 

If a city wants to help manufacturing industries stay within
its confines it would be better to directly subsidize the industry. This way the polity would be clear in the
costs associated with keeping these industries in the city. Subsidizing industry would be part of the
annual political battles over the budget. This can be messy and there is no guarantee
that manufacturing industries would continue to receive support. It would be
difficult to decide just how much subsidy to provide. But democracy is messy. If
planning is about promoting democracy we should be in favor of as much
transparency as possible.

 

Zoning that would allow manufacturing and other uses (this
would only apply to manufacturing that meets performance standards that make it
compatible with residential or commercial uses) would satisfy proponents of
allowing the market to determine the highest and best use of land. But by providing direct subsidies to
manufacturing, the harmful effects of the market could be blunted, if citizens
believe it is worth the costs.


Lance Freeman

Lance Freeman is an associate professor in the Urban Planning program at Columbia University in New York City where he teaches courses on housing policy and research methods. He has also taught in the School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Delaware. Prior to this, Dr. Freeman worked as a researcher at Mathematica Policy Research, a leading social policy research firm in Washington D.C. Dr. Freeman holds a Masters degree and a Ph.D. in City and Regional Planning from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Dr.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

June 25, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Person wearing mask walking through temporary outdoor dining setup lined with bistro lights at dusk in New York City.

Restaurant Patios Were a Pandemic Win — Why Were They so Hard to Keep?

Social distancing requirements and changes in travel patterns prompted cities to pilot new uses for street and sidewalk space. Then it got complicated.

June 19, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Map of Western U.S. indicating public lands that would be for sale under a Senate plan in yellow and green.

Map: Where Senate Republicans Want to Sell Your Public Lands

For public land advocates, the Senate Republicans’ proposal to sell millions of acres of public land in the West is “the biggest fight of their careers.”

June 19, 2025 - Outdoor Life

Aerial view of town of Wailuku in Maui, Hawaii with mountains in background against cloudy sunset sky.

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly

Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

July 1 - Honolulu Civil Beat

White and purple sign for Slow Street in San Francisco, California with people crossing crosswalk.

San Francisco Suspends Traffic Calming Amidst Record Deaths

Citing “a challenging fiscal landscape,” the city will cease the program on the heels of 42 traffic deaths, including 24 pedestrians.

July 1 - KQED

Tents inhabited by unhoused people lined up on sidewalk in Los Angeles, California in front of industrial building.

California Homeless Arrests, Citations Spike After Ruling

An investigation reveals that anti-homeless actions increased up to 500% after Grants Pass v. Johnson — even in cities claiming no policy change.

July 1 - Times of San Diego

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.

Write for Planetizen