The Shock Doctrine Comes to New Orleans
Naomi Klein believes that HUD's demolition of public housing in New Orleans isn't just about responding to flood damage: it's a classic example of what she calls "The Shock Doctrine" -- using disasters to restructure and privatize whole economies.
Naomi Klein writes: "Readers of my book The Shock Doctrine know that one of the most shameless examples of disaster capitalism has been the attempt to exploit the disastrous flooding of New Orleans to close down that city's public housing projects, some of the only affordable units in the city. Most of the buildings sustained minimal flood damage, but they happen to occupy valuable land that make for perfect condo developments and hotels.
The final showdown over New Orleans public housing is playing out in dramatic fashion right now. The conflict is a classic example of the "triple shock" formula at the core of the doctrine.
- First came the shock of the original disaster: the flood and the traumatic evacuation.
- Next came the "economic shock therapy": using the window of opportunity opened up by the first shock to push through a rapid-fire attack on the city's public services and spaces, most notably it's homes, schools and hospitals.
-Now we see that as residents of New Orleans try to resist these attacks, they are being met with a third shock: the shock of the police baton and the Taser gun, used on the bodies of protestors outside New Orleans City Hall yesterday."
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Federal Housing and Envirnomental Policies Clash in New Orleans - Jan 05, 2012
- Picture Not So Rosy in the Ninth Ward - Sep 05, 2011
- New Orleans Sets New Rules for Public Housing - Aug 05, 2011
- Discrimination Case Over Katrina Housing Settled - Jul 07, 2011
- Slow Progress in East New Orleans - Jun 28, 2011


















The Shock Doctrine
The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein is an excellent read, not just from the perspective of a planner, but also a citizen of Earth.
A must read.
Although it is disturbing what certain people has attempted to do in New Orleans, it is even more disturbing when read with the context of the rest of the book.
Very well written and cited. If you care about democracy, read this book.