Healthy Communities? Check!

The built environment is a significant contributor to community health – a fact that researchers, planners, public health practitioners, and advocates around the country are becoming increasingly aware of. We know, for example, that people who live in more “walkable” communities are in fact more likely to walk. Research has demonstrated that living near a grocery store increases consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables. Children who live near freeways may suffer from respiratory problems for the rest of their lives. These facts should be particularly important in shaping land use decisions as we face rising costs from the obesity epidemic and other chronic diseases. This leaves public health advocates wondering just how best to dig into the world of planning.

3 minute read

April 12, 2007, 3:30 PM PDT

By Lisa Feldstein


The built environment is a significant contributor to community health – a fact that researchers, planners, public health practitioners, and advocates around the country are becoming increasingly aware of. We know, for example, that people who live in more "walkable" communities are in fact more likely to walk. Research has demonstrated that living near a grocery store increases consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables. Children who live near freeways may suffer from respiratory problems for the rest of their lives. These facts should be particularly important in shaping land use decisions as we face rising costs from the obesity epidemic and other chronic diseases.

This leaves public health advocates wondering just how best to dig into the world of planning. Not only are planning tools and concepts a "foreign language" requiring interdisciplinary training and new ways of looking at community health, but there isn't a clear "one size fits all" method for participation in built environment decision-making processes. In growing communities, like many in California and across the Western United States, public health staff may be faced with proposed master planned developments that will bring thousands of new residents to their communities. In urban and built-out communities, infill development poses its own challenges. The question is: how can public health advocates best contribute to these processes and help ensure that new development maximizes opportunities to improve community health?

One tool that some public health agencies are developing and using is "healthy development checklists." These checklists are designed to provide users with a framework in which to evaluate different elements of a development from a public health perspective. They look at issues like street design, waste water management, and air quality, among others. The National Association of City and County Health Officials developed a Public Health in Land Use Planning and Community Design checklist with the Tri County Health Department (CO). The Shasta County Health Department (CA) has made their own Public Health Development Checklist tailored to their local needs. And a recently-released Healthy Development Measurement Tool (HDMT), created by the San Francisco Department of Public Health – Environmental Health Division suggests a broad spectrum of measurable indicators that health advocates and communities can use to assess how a proposed development might affect health. These indicators cover a wide variety of categories, including Environmental Stewardship, Sustainable and Safe Transportation, Adequate and Healthy Housing, and Community Participation.

Checklists are welcome tools because they allow communities to engage with development in a standardized, replicable way - one that hopefully improves the health outcomes that result from these developments. However, they don't let practitioners off the hook when it comes to the hard work of figuring out what local health issues are most pressing and tailoring checklists to fit local needs. They also don't tell communities what is a "healthy" or "unhealthy" development – a fact that the HDMT makes refreshingly transparent. Development is always about tradeoffs. Choosing to build high-density residential developments next to a freeway might result in negative health impacts for those residents, but could potentially improve regional air quality if regional vehicle miles traveled decrease. This contentious trade-off is discussed in a recent article of the California Planning and Development Review by William Fulton. Both planners and public health practitioners should resist using development checklists as a simple way to say "yes" or "no" to development, and instead see them as a way to make trade-offs more visible, improve proposals, and to engage the community in a discussion about how our communities should grow.


Lisa Feldstein

Lisa Feldstein is a Doctoral Candidate at the Department of City and Regional Planning at UC Berkeley. She is a 2012 Robert & Patricia Switzer Foundation Fellow, a 2012 Fellow at the Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, the 2010 recipient of The Robert A. Catlin/David W. Long Memorial Scholarship, and the 2009 recipient of the Friesen Fellowship for Leadership in Undergraduate Education. Lisa is formerly the Senior Policy Director with the Public Health Law Program, in which capacity she directed the organization's Land Use and Health Program.

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Aerial view of town of Wailuku in Maui, Hawaii with mountains in background against cloudy sunset sky.

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly

Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

July 1, 2025 - Honolulu Civil Beat

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

July 2, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

Map of Haussmann's redesign of Paris in the 1850s through 1870s under Napoleon III.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking

Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

June 30, 2025 - Tom Sanchez

Brutalist grey department of housing and urban development building in Washington DC.

How Trump's HUD Budget Proposal Would Harm Homelessness Response

Experts say the change to the HUD budget would make it more difficult to identify people who are homeless and connect them with services, and to prevent homelessness.

10 minutes ago - Shelterforce Magazine

Lancaster Boulevard with tree-lined median and wide sidewalks in Lancaster, California.

The Vast Potential of the Right-of-Way

One writer argues that the space between two building faces is the most important element of the built environment.

29 minutes ago - Streetsblog USA

Sign in front of building for seior services center in St. Petersburg, Fl.

Florida Seniors Face Rising Homelessness Risk

High housing costs are pushing more seniors, many of them on a fixed income, into homelessness.

2 hours ago - WESH

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.

Associate/Senior Planner

Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development

Senior Planner

Heyer Gruel & Associates PA

Write for Planetizen