Can Busy Residential Streets Be As Toxic As Freeways?
Findings from a new study on air pollution found that notwithstanding lower traffic volumes, "heavily traveled secondary highways" may be just as toxic as freeways laden with diesel trucks or major railyards.
Students at a Roseville middle school near busy, 6-lane Watt Avenue "are breathing higher levels of toxic particles than people immediately downwind of the Roseville train yard, the single largest generator of such pollution in the Sacramento area, according to an air pollution study scheduled to be released today (Dec.13).
"It shocked us all," said Thomas Cahill, a University of California, Davis, atmospheric physicist who led the study."
"Those findings spurred Cahill to look deeper. How could particle pollution that is normally associated with diesel soot be just as high along residential Watt as a freeway, with all its soot spewing trucks and buses? The most likely answer, the scientists concluded, was that the particles near the Arden school came mostly from run-down cars burning engine oil.
"A small fraction of cars dominates the automotive pollution," Cahill said. "That's a small fraction of cars putting out very toxic stuff."
Smoke from burned motor oil contains benzo-a-pyrene, the most prevalent cancer-causing air pollutant in California, Cahill said.
"Just because people may live along residential streets instead of freeways doesn't mean that they're safe from the harmful effects of car exhaust particulates, " Cahill said.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related News Stories
How Much Does Bad Air In LA and Central Valley Cost California? - Nov 21, 2008
Would $3 Gas Balance California's Budget? - Nov 21, 2008
Officials Working Out Nitty-Gritty of Rail Project - Nov 19, 2008
California Not Ready for Climate Change - Nov 19, 2008
Deal Brokered for Biggest Dam Removal Project in U.S. - Nov 17, 2008

