Cleveland's Housing Court
Is it good for the community? The neighborhood? The block? These are the questions that drive decisions in one city’s housing court.
In most courtrooms the system is set up to reward or punish individuals no one considers the impact of the decision on the larger community. But in Cleveland Housing Court, communities ravaged by abandoned and dilapidated buildings have the most at stake. If this court has a bias, its that it tends to support whats good for community.
Thanks to David Holtzman
Full Story:
Published on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 in
- Surprising Ridership Data on Los Angeles Metro's New Expo Line Extension
- Inclusionary Zoning and Unintended Consequences
- The Cute and The Iconic
- The ASLA's New Guide to Resilient Design
- A Message to Suburban Counties: Invest in Transit or Get Left Behind
- The Days of 'Uber-for-X' May Be Over
- Redefining Success for Younger Generations
- CIAM's Third Way
- A First Look at New Migration Data
- The Value of Garbage Has Changed Dramatically
- Memphis Bus Riders Union Scoring Victories
- How to Manage Retreat in the Face of Sea-Level Rise and Nuisance Floods
- Op-Ed: Parking Concerns Can't Outweigh Affordable Housing
- Safety Gets Top Priority in San Francisco Street Reconfiguration
- Planetizen Week in Review: September 24, 2016
- Denver to Offer New Transit Oriented Height Bonuses for Affordable Housing
- California Transit Agencies Bring Affordable Housing to Scale
- 'Project Sidewalk' App Rates Accessibility
- JetBlue to Reduce Carbon Footprint with Large Purchase of Renewable Jet Fuel
- Roboboats, err...Roboats May Soon Navigate Amsterdam's Canals
