WTC a 'Planning Catastrophe'?
3 June 2005 - 8:00am
The controversy over what to build at ground zero has been complicated, but is also "very New York". The real catastrophe would be to let the crater sit empty any longer than it must.
"While the building has yet to begin in earnest in the hole we call Ground Zero, a new conventional wisdom about it has been born: the disaster of destruction has been made worse by the disaster of reconstruction...But it is not a catastrophe, and the process under way could still result in a concentration of magnificent architecture."
Full Story:
A disaster of reconstruction?
Source:
Newsday, June 2, 2005
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Critiquing the Architectural Critic - Mar 07, 2010
- Architect Banned From Brooklyn For Deceiving Planning Dept. - Mar 04, 2010
- Death Wish and Robert Moses - Feb 17, 2010
- Tough Choices in Pleasantville, NY - Feb 16, 2010
- Habitat for Humanity Embraces Density - Feb 04, 2010
“
No matter how one wanted to organize the ideal city, housing security would be part of it. No community can function effectively if large numbers of its residents are regularly displaced or perpetually at risk of being displaced.
”



















