Smart Growth, Dumb Choice
19 August 2003 - 1:00pm
Joel Schwartz and Wendell Cox argue that "Smart Growth" is a dumb choice unless you want higher housing prices and increased traffic congestion.
"Smart growth plans pack people into high-density neighborhoods. But is that what consumers and home buyers want? Developers don't force consumers to choose "sprawl" against their will. In a dynamic and competitive housing market, developers have a tremendous incentive to find out what combination of amenities will most appeal to home buyers. If people were clamoring to live in high-rise apartments or condos, developers would build them. Right now, most people, especially those in Bakersfield and the valley, want single-family homes with a bit of land in the front and back yard."
Source:
Reason Public Policy Institute, August 10, 2003
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- The Appeal of In-Town Big Box - Feb 12, 2012
- San Francisco Businesses Thrive Without Parking - Jan 26, 2012
- In LA, Agricultural-Residential Zoned Neighborhoods Threatened - Jan 25, 2012
- Revealing Parking's Hidden Costs - Jan 20, 2012
- Tea Party Activists Disrupt Planning Meeting - Jan 12, 2012
“
"This ends up being, to be sure, a second best alternative, but it's better than the third best alternative, which is to do nothing." -- Jerold Kayden
”


















