Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
Voters to Decide Future of San Francisco Homeless Tent Encampments
Tuesday was the deadline for the Board of Supervisors to approve measures for the November ballot that they are unable to pass themselves. In addition to the tent measure, two other housing initiatives were approved.
"Voters in a city long weary of seeing sidewalks filled with homeless camps will soon get the chance to prove just how willing they are to see them forcibly cleared," writes Emily Green who covers San Francisco City Hall for the San Francisco Chronicle.
An initiative by San Francisco Supervisor Mark Farrell to allow authorities to remove an encampment, as long as its residents are given 24-hour written notice and the offer of a shelter bed or other form of housing, is among a number of initiatives headed for the November ballot.
The signatures of four supervisors are required to place an initiative on the ballot, and Farrell was joined by Scott Wiener, Katy Tang and Malia Cohen.
Supervisor John Avalos criticized the measure.
“There are not enough shelter beds for all the people living in encampments,” Avalos said... Avalos and the Coalition on Homelessness want the city to provide bathroom and garbage services to homeless camps.Farrell countered: “This is about the right policy for the city of San Francisco, and the reality is we are designating significant amounts of additional revenue in the budget for shelter and housing.” He said allowing people to stay in tent camps is “inherently unhealthy, incredibly dangerous.”
San Francisco is hardly alone in dealing with growing numbers of homeless. In March, Planetizen editor James Brasuell wrote about recent efforts by Los Angeles, Dallas, as well as San Francisco (including helpful links to understand the local issues) to 'crack down' on homeless encampments.
Two other housing measures the supervisors approved placing on the November ballot dealt with increasing heights for affordable housing and legalizing construction on inlaw units.
The former measure, by Supervisor Katy Tang, would "allow 100 percent affordable housing projects to have three extra stories," writes Green. "The progressive supervisors, led by Aaron Peskin, have introduced a counterproposal, but with more restrictions. The two sides are at an impasse."
The measure originated in a proposal to increasing building heights as part of a density bonus policy "to reach [Mayor Ed] Lee’s goal of 30,000 new or rehabbed housing units by 2020" that has met opposition," baffling city planners, wrote J.K. Dineen for The Chronicle last February.
Opposition to Tang's building height measure is described in greater detail in an separate article by Green on June 21 about Mayor Ed Lee's housing plan being placed 'on hold' by the supervisors.
- Government / Politics
- Social / Demographics
- Urban Development
- San Francisco
- 2016 Campaign
- Ballot Measures
- Building Heights
- Tent Cities
- Coalition on Homelessness
- SF Board of Supervisors
- Supervisor John Avalos
- Supervisor Mark Farrell
- Mayor Ed Lee
- Supervisor Aaron Peskin
- Supervisor Katy Tang
- Supervisor Scott Wiener