Once again the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) published its annual Urban Mobility Report (UMR), and once again I feel obliged to warn planners that it is based on faulty assumptions and biased analysis methods. This is not to deny that traffic congestion is a significant problem, but the UMR significantly exaggerates its importance compared with other transport costs and exaggerates roadway expansion benefits.
Traffic Congestion
The Economics of Traffic Jams
Five Cities With Five Different Congestion Solutions
A Gradual Approach to Improve a Busy San Francisco Street
Pedestrians' Dangerous Walk in Mumbai
High Tech Approach To Decongesting Midtown Manhattan
More Lanes Means More Traffic
Will Congestion Pricing Backfire in the U.S.?
Which is the Real Culprit, Growth or Cars?
The Worst Cities for Traffic

Threats of Gridlock are Greatly Exaggerated
A few weeks ago the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) released its latest Urban Mobility Report, and yesterday INRIX released its National Traffic Scorecard 2010 Annual Report. Both paint a grim picture of roadway conditions.
“America is back on the road to gridlock,” warns INRIX.
TTI's Urban Mobility Report Flawed, Says Critic
Beijing's Plan To Limit Traffic Antagonizes Auto Dealers
Transportation Research Helped Create Sprawl, New Report Says
China's Road To Nowhere

Changing Travel Demands: Implications for Planning
The graph below shows the most recent USDOT vehicle-travel data covering the last 25 years. Although vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) grew steadily during most of the Twentieth Century, in recent years the growth rate stopped and even declined a little. It is now about 10% below where it would have been had past trends continued.

How Much Does Congestion Matter?
Strip Malls Lose Customers During Special Events, Heavy Traffic
Mega-Project Gets Miniaturized

Learning from TTI
This week, I finally got around to looking at the latest (2009) Texas Transportation Institute study on traffic congestion. (1)
Two facts struck me as interesting. First, the great congestion surge of the past decade or two is over. In most large metropolitan areas, congestion (measured as hours lost to congestion per traveler) peaked around 2005, and actually declined in 2005-07. For example, in Atlanta, hours lost to congestion peaked at 61, and decreased to 57 by 2007. Congestion increased in only three of the fourteen largest regions (Washington, Detroit and Houston)- and in each of these by only one hour per traveler.





















