The Eleventh Smart Growth Principle

24 June 2003 - 12:00am

Sprawl is reaching military installations and threatening the nation's defense capabilities.

Untitled Document

Photo: Joel HirschhornYou might think if ten commandments were sufficient, then why is an eleventh smart growth principle needed? It is and this is why.

Sprawl's tentacles have reached out to choke military facilities, including bases, training ranges, airfields and air corridors. The phenomenon is called encroachment. Some land uses do not impact military operations, but many do and these are called incompatible land uses. A big problem is sprawl housing and schools that put people in harm's way of aircraft accidents and exploding ordinance, for example. Residents who move close to military installations complain a lot about noise and other effects from aircraft and various types of training operations. Angry residents apply pressure on elected officials. The result often is a loss of mission capabilities and flexibility. The mere presence of development can sometimes be a problem, such as lights interfering with night operations.

The armed services have tried many things to limit incompatible land development around once isolated facilities. They have not been effective enough. Land developers and home builders often ignore advisories, and strong zoning restrictions have not been used enough by local governments. In many places there is no legal requirement to disclose to home buyers and renters that an active military facility is close enough to impact their location.

When encroachment has major impacts it jeopardizes the long term viability of military facilities because future base closings are determined, in part, on impacts of encroachment. Base closings threaten local and state economies, because direct and indirect economic contributions of military activities can be as large as or larger than major industrial and commercial activities.

The encroachment situation has become so threatening that some local and state governments have been taking major steps to prevent future incompatible land uses near military facilities, and many more such actions are likely. Two National Governors Association (NGA) reports provide considerable information on encroachment and the policy strategies to address it. (see http://www.nga.org/center/topics/1,1188,D_4504,00.html)

And now to the eleventh smart growth principle. At NGA's last winter meeting of the governors the existing Principles for Better Land Use policy, that includes the original ten smart growth principles, was amended with this eleventh principle:

  • encourage local land-use planning for compatible uses near military installations.

Other groups should also consider adopting and actively supporting this encroachment principle, because it is a logical and needed addition to the national smart growth movement. Encroachment threatens national defense capabilities and, therefore, adopting the eleventh principle is also being patriotic. Conversely, among sprawl's many negatives you can add that it can also be unpatriotic.


Joel Hirschhorn lives in an old neighborhood near Rock Creek Park in Chevy Chase, Maryland, very close to Washington, D.C., and likes it much more than the suburban sprawl subdivision he once lived in. He has worked in the environmental and policy areas for many years and is currently Director of the Natural Resources Policy Studies of the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. The views expressed here are solely those of the author.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Overwhelmed

I'm overwhelmed by the current politics on national issues, domestic and foreign, and too often find Rightwing argumentation biased, one-sided, even mean-spirited, though usually with more-or-less important points. Where's the compassionate conservatism?

I thought there might be irony in your post, Dudley, but feared this irony might be taken seriously. You could say I've become more touchy than usual in the current political climate.

I strongly support New Urbanism, Smart Growth, Regional Planning, and infrastructure for non-automobile modes of travel. Since the debate is more demoralizing than conclusive, I'll continue to be supportive. I've seen NU and SG produce good results. Sorry about the confusion.

Reply

I would like to clarify that my comments were intended as irony. Far from being a right-wing idealogue, I am completely sympathetic to both smart growth and anti-war activism. I merely intended to point out that Mr. Hirschhorn's thesis raised what I perceive as a potent irony. Indeed, I would agree that sprawl is unpatriotic, but not for the reasons stated in the op-ed -- like the Detroit Project (http://www.thedetroitproject.com), I believe that it runs counter to the national interest to promote development that makes a nation so dependent on a resource (oil) largely derived from unstable parts of the world. I would refer Mr. Lewellan to an earlier op-ed of my own from October 2001. My apologies if my off-hand remark was mis-interpreted.

The 11th Commandment

If it's bad it must be sprawl. Joel Hirschhorn is entirely correct that enroachment of incompatible land uses are a problem. A problem not just for the military but for almost every activity. Unfortunately, in the name of "Smart Growth," Mr. Hirschhorn has singled out sprawl and then proposes to allow Smart Growth to address the problem. Compatible adjacent land use is good planning practice regardless of this weeks' fad planner theory. Ooops, we didn't take this far enough did we? The logical consequence of compatible adjacent land use zoning results in exactly the Conventional Suburban Design (CSD) that Smart Growth is supposed to combat. Indeed, a central tenet of Smart Growth is to encourage more diverse adjacent land use designations. It turns out that while a very good idea, compatible land use is anti-Smart Growth.

Hey hey, ho ho! Smart Growth is the Way to Go!

Mr Dudley is co-opting a typical activist chant, (hey hey, ho ho), to slam Smart Growth and propagandize Left political activists, as if slamming Smart Growth is aligned with that political ideology. His intent seems duplicitous.

I've seen worse Right wing propaganda, outright lies, mislead social/environmental activists. I've also seen such propaganda backfire.

As no greater heirs to national heritage than other US citizens, Right wing ideologues should not ignore the extremely detrimental impacts of sprawl and auto-dependency. The US Constitution does not sanctify a Right to pollute, abuse and destroy our Natural Heritage.

Hey hey ho ho! Smart growth has to go!

The notion that sprawl can interfere with America's military is going to cause no small amount of internal conflict among otherwise sprawl-busting peace activists...

Bookmark and Share

Related News Stories

    There are currently no posts in this category.

The World Parking Symposium is meant to generate discussions about parking impacts, how the field is evolving and what new research is needed.