In The Name Of Smart Growth
29 December 2002 - 11:00am
Charlotte Observer associate editor Mary Newsom writes that misusing the term "Smart Growth" will give the movement a bad name.
"When residents of older neighborhoods oppose high-density projects as certain to worsen traffic, they shouldn't always be dismissed as NIMBYs, because...sometimes they have a point...A dense or mixed-use project doesn't automatically qualify as smart growth if it is located at the city fringe, while core neighborhoods remain hollowed out."
Source:
Smart Growth Online, December 29, 2002
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Using Adaptive Reuse to Scale the Urban Future - Feb 08, 2012
- Why Tea Party Criticism Should Matter to Planners - Feb 08, 2012
- Saving the Mall By Returning to Its Ideals - Feb 07, 2012
- Ranking Housing Affordability in America - Jan 25, 2012
- In Defense of the Grid - Jan 23, 2012
“
New Suburbanism is not a new design paradigm that seeks to compete with or discredit principles of New Urbanism. Instead, our perspective represents a broad-based attempt to find the best, most practical ways to develop and redevelop suburban communities.
”


















