Car registration statistics from Multnomah County show passenger vehicle ownership is less popular among its growing number of residents. The residents forgoing cars have done themselves a favor in more ways than one.
Michael Anderson has written a pair of posts to calculate the effect of reduced car ownership in Portland, Oregon. According to the premise of both articles, about 38,501 additional cars would be on the road in Portland if residents owned cars at the same rate as in 2007.
The first post, published in June, calculated and visualized the amount of space the reduced car ownership gains the city. For that record, "that’s everything between NE Killingsworth, Skidmore, Rodney and 16th," or "it’s the entire Foster-Powell neighborhood west of SE 73rd Avenue," among other large swaths of the city.
Andersen's newest post focuses on "the money that isn’t being spent to move, maintain, insure and replace all those cars." For each of the 38,501 cars, Andersen calculates a savings in insurance, purchase, and taxes and fees to produce a "very low estimate of direct car ownership costs per year" totaling $2,178. "So just by not owning 38,501 cars that they would have owned in 2007, Multnomah County residents are saving $83,855,178 each year to spend on other things instead," concludes Andersen.
Andersen the imagines a wish list of big ticket items that could be paid for with the money saved on reduced car-related spending, including eliminating tuition at Portland Community College, building out the entire bike plan for the city, or nearly eliminating fares on the TriMet transit system.
FULL STORY: Portland’s drop in car use frees up $138 million in our local economy every year
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
World's Largest Wildlife Overpass In the Works in Los Angeles County
Caltrans will soon close half of the 101 Freeway in order to continue construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing near Agoura Hills in Los Angeles County.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
AI Traffic Management Comes to Dallas-Fort Worth
Several Texas cities are using an AI-powered platform called NoTraffic to help manage traffic signals to increase safety and improve traffic flow.
Podcast: Addressing the Root Causes of Transit Violence
Deploying transit police is a short-term fix. How can transit agencies build sustainable safety efforts?
Minneapolis as a Model for Housing Affordability
Through a combination of policies, the city has managed to limit the severity of the nationwide housing crisis.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.