Do Architecture Competitions Work?
19 August 2002 - 5:00am
Witold Rybczynski writes in The Atlantic Monthly that public architecture competitions don't always produce the best buildings.
"I am skeptical that designing in the full glare of public competitions encourages architects to produce better buildings. The charged atmosphere promotes flamboyance rather than careful thought, and favors the glib and obvious over the subtle and nuanced. Architects have always entered competitions, but they have usually seasoned their talents first by doing commissioned work. Libeskind, Nouvel, Koolhaas, and other young architects of today have built their reputations almost entirely by participating in competitions; a friend of mine calls them 'competition show dogs.'"
Full Story:
The Bilbao Effect
Source:
The Atlantic Monthly, September 1, 2002
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Using Adaptive Reuse to Scale the Urban Future - Feb 08, 2012
- The Collapse of the Architecture Profession - Feb 06, 2012
- A Reality Check for Architects - Jan 19, 2012
- The Challenges of Building A House on Mars - Jan 09, 2012
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
“
Its very unsuitability for an urban center justifies its current usage as a suburban or ex-urban pattern.
”


















