The New York Times science writer examines the findings of the National Academy of Sciences panel released Feb. 10 that support further research on the two geoengineering strategies of carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management.
The endorsement from the prestigious National Academies of Sciences, a division of the National Research Council, is a significant step as the strategies are viewed as controversial and opposed by some environmental groups.
"Almost all of the [geoengineering] research has been done on computers, simulating the effects of the technique on the climate," writes Henry Fountain. "The panel said the research could include small-scale outdoor experiments, which many scientists say are necessary to better understand whether and how geoengineering would work."
The only previous attempt at conducting "an outdoor test of some of the engineering concepts", i.e., outside a computer lab, occurred in Britain in 2011. "It provoked a public outcry. The experiment was eventually canceled," writes Fountain.
While Plan A remains reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the panel said, "It may be prudent to examine additional options for limiting the risks from climate change.”
“The committee felt that the need for information at this point outweighs the need for shoving this topic under the rug,” Marcia K. McNutt, chairwoman of the panel and the editor in chief of the journal Science, said at a news conference in Washington.
The Two Geoengineering Strategies:
- Carbon dioxide removal: Low risk but expensive. "But the group said research was needed to develop efficient and effective methods to both remove the gas and store it so it remains out of the atmosphere indefinitely."
While Fountain doesn't elaborate on this process, just two days earlier he wrote about a $10 million carbon capture and storage project in Iceland.
-
Solar radiation management: Far more controversial, may "have unintended effects on weather patterns around the world" but inexpensive. "Most discussions of the concept focus on the idea of dispersing sulfates or other chemicals high in the atmosphere, where they would reflect sunlight, in some ways mimicking the effect of a large volcanic eruption.
Last year the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its Fifth Assessment Report acknowledged that geoengineering may have a role in climate change mitigation strategies, as has the UK Royal Society in 2009.
The NAS panel was "supported by NASA and other federal agencies, including what the reports described as the 'U.S. intelligence community'," writes Fountain—posted here by Planetizen in 2013.
FULL STORY: Panel Urges Research on Geoengineering as a Tool Against Climate Change
The Mall Is Dead — Long Live the Mall
The American shopping mall may be closer to its original vision than ever.
The Paradox of American Housing
How the tension between housing as an asset and as an essential good keeps the supply inadequate and costs high.
Report: Las Vegas, Houston Top List of Least Affordable Cities
The report assesses the availability of affordable rental units for low-income households.
Anchorage Leaders Debate Zoning Reform Plan
Last year, the city produced the fewest new housing units in a decade.
How to Protect Pedestrians With Disabilities
Public agencies don’t track traffic deaths and injuries involving disabled people, leaving a gap in data to guide safety interventions.
Colorado Town Fills Workforce Housing Need With ‘Dorm-Style’ Housing
Median rent in Steamboat Springs is $4,000 per month.
City of Yakima
City of Auburn
Baylands Development Inc.
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
City of Birmingham, Alabama
City of Laramie, Wyoming
Town of Zionsville
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.