While the controversial $250 million for the embattled San Francisco to Los Angeles bullet train received from cap and trade much attention in the mainstream media, allocations to transit, affordable housing and other categories received much less attention except in the nonprofit world where groups fiercely fought for them. Stuart Cohen, executive director of TransForm, lists the winners outside of high speed rail for the fiscal year that begins July 1:
These cap and trade revenues are not like other budgetary items where the governor and legislature squabble annually over how much to allocate. Sixty percent of future revenues - and they are expected to grow substantially as more industries "fall under the cap", will be split by three categories:
That leaves 40% of revenue that is discretionary. Cohen suggests beneficiaries could be Low-Carbon Transportation, Energy Efficiency, Urban Forestry, Forestry, Water, and Waste.
Amanda Eaken of NRDC includes a pie chart of the first year allocation and future allocations in her blog about how the new budget implements "California’s landmark Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Law (SB 375), both this year and into the future."
Eaken describes the sustainable communities breakdown:
Just how much revenue are we talking about here? AP reporter Juliet Williams writes that the single largest category, high speed rail, could receive a whopping "$3 billion to $5 billion a year in coming years" from the cap and trade fund, at least through 2020 which is when the law that authorizes it, AB 32 expires.
One important caveat: litigation. This is California, after all.