A new report by the Celluloid Beach Institute, titled “A Critical Examination of Trends From Dénouement to Finale in the Prevailing Narrative of Geographically Stationed Life Cycles,” studied the lives of thousands of subjects in various metropolitan regions around the country for about 90 to 120 minutes to determine the likelihood of a Hollywood Ending.
The study reports that the impact of geographic location on the likelihood of Hollywood Endings was not statistically significant except in Los Angeles. According to the study’s abstract: “Except in Los Angeles, there doesn’t seem to be any geographic premium on the occurrence of meaningful events, or, for that matter, ambiguous events that require a deeper intellectual or emotional struggle to comprehend.”
Here are a few examples of the report’s findings:
The report defines most examples of the Hollywood Ending as “a satisfying conclusion to a zesty, vicarious thrill that reinforces the audience to emerge from the experience ready to navigate the world, like in Collateral, starring Tom Cruise, or Point Break, starring Keanu Reeves.” The study, however, also included a subgenre of Hollywood Ending, defined as “an ironic or ambiguous ending which should be classified as serious art and inspires the audience to complicate and problematize their assumptions, like the Oscar-Award winning Crash, starring an ensemble cast of critically acclaimed actors and actresses, or End of Watch, starring Jake Gyllenhall.” In the latter case, the study controlled for Chinatown, because, according to the study, “no one really understands what the hell happened in that movie anyway.”
The report stops short of making a larger conclusion about the meaning of these data: “It’s unclear if so many movies are produced and set in Los Angeles to imitate the satisfying nature of events that unfold in the region or whether the satisfying nature of so many movies produced and set in Los Angeles invite the mimicry of the environment.” Further study is recommended to determine the resolution of that question.