Why New Urbanism Fails
18 February 2002 - 7:00am
Behind their quaint, cozy facades, New Urbanist towns still fail to combat the pattern of sprawling, auto-centric suburban development.
New Urbanist developments may be aesthetically pleasing, but aesthetics alone do not create community or urbanity. New Urbanist towns too often commit the most heinous of urban sins: they segregate zones. Certainly, it is not uncommon to find small commercial outlets in the residential quarters of neotraditional developments, but by and large these neighbourhoods follow the standard planning principle of the past fifty years, which is to distinctly separate zones according to use.
Full Story:
Why New Urbanism Fails
Source:
Planetizen, February 18, 2002
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Using Adaptive Reuse to Scale the Urban Future - Feb 08, 2012
- The Collapse of the Architecture Profession - Feb 06, 2012
- A Reality Check for Architects - Jan 19, 2012
- The Challenges of Building A House on Mars - Jan 09, 2012
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
“
New Suburbanism is not a new design paradigm that seeks to compete with or discredit principles of New Urbanism. Instead, our perspective represents a broad-based attempt to find the best, most practical ways to develop and redevelop suburban communities.
”


















