A recent study suggesting that mixed-use zoning increases crime is not as persuasive as it might seem at first glance.
A recent study published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review analyzes the crime rates of numerous blocks in Los Angeles, and concludes that single-use residential areas have the lowest crime rates. (The article also suggests that mixed-use places have less crime than commercial blocks). According to the authors' logic, the isolation of commerce from housing protects us all from crime- at least if we don't bother to visit commercial places. (By this logic, the only safe place to shop is online!)
It seems to me that the article's attempt to compare mixed-use and single-use places is inherently flawed. Suppose that mixed-use block A has 100 residents and 20 crimes per year, while single-use residential block B has 200 people and 10 crimes per year. At first glance, block A has far more crime: it has 20 crimes per 100 residents while block B has only 5.
But this logic overlooks something. Block B will almost never have more than 200 people on any given day (except for occasional visitors); thus, it makes sense to evaluate Block B's crime rates by dividing the number of crimes by the number of residents, But mixed-use Block A's real universe of potential victims is not just the 100 residents of that block: it is the 100 residents PLUS the people who come to Block A to shop and work. So if Block A has 400 commercial visitors per day, its real population is 500 (the residents plus the visitors). Thus, a better way to calculate Block A's crime rate is to divide its 20 crimes by 500 residents. Under this method, Block A has only 4 crimes per 100 people- fewer than Block B!
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
World's Largest Wildlife Overpass In the Works in Los Angeles County
Caltrans will soon close half of the 101 Freeway in order to continue construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing near Agoura Hills in Los Angeles County.
U.S. Supreme Court: California's Impact Fees May Violate Takings Clause
A California property owner took El Dorado County to state court after paying a traffic impact fee he felt was exorbitant. He lost in trial court, appellate court, and the California Supreme Court denied review. Then the U.S. Supreme Court acted.
California Grid Runs on 100% Renewable Energy for Over 9 Hours
The state’s energy grid was entirely powered by clean energy for some portion of the day on 37 out of the last 45 days.
New Forecasting Tool Aims to Reduce Heat-Related Deaths
Two federal agencies launched a new, easy-to-use, color-coded heat warning system that combines meteorological and medical risk factors.
AI Traffic Management Comes to Dallas-Fort Worth
Several Texas cities are using an AI-powered platform called NoTraffic to help manage traffic signals to increase safety and improve traffic flow.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Write for Planetizen
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.