2002's Top Land Use Supreme Court Case
10 January 2002 - 9:00am
The year's key land use case before the U.S. Supreme Court is a 32-month building moratorium an unconstitutional taking of property rights.
Once again, the year's key land use case before the U.S. Supreme Court comesfrom California. This time, the question for the high court is whether a32-month building moratorium imposed by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agencywas an unconstitutional taking of property rights. Lake Tahoe area property owners seeking compensation for a moratorium on development first enacted two decades ago received a mixed reaction on Monday from the two Supreme Court justices who hold the critical votes for their claims.
Source:
California Planning and Development Report, January 9, 2002
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- The Appeal of In-Town Big Box - Feb 12, 2012
- San Francisco Businesses Thrive Without Parking - Jan 26, 2012
- In LA, Agricultural-Residential Zoned Neighborhoods Threatened - Jan 25, 2012
- Revealing Parking's Hidden Costs - Jan 20, 2012
- Tea Party Activists Disrupt Planning Meeting - Jan 12, 2012
“
Under the proposal, the government would assign the populace the task of counting and mapping dog droppings as a first step to greater penalties for owners who fail to clean up after their mutts.
”
Planetizen picks
Contribute
- Murky Future for Two of D.C.'s Architectural Gems
- The Story Behind One of the Most Controversial Buildings in the Country
- The Benefits of Creating Hybrid Zoning Codes
- The Appeal of In-Town Big Box
- The Growing Appeal of Drinking From the Toilet
- How and Why Does an Architect Become Famous?
- Could Good Design Have Prevented the Housing Crisis?
- NY Times Defends the Port Authority
- Expanding the Hong Kong Subway, One Blast at a Time
- Can An Electric Bike Replace A Car?
Volunteerism Plays Critical Role in Reaching World’s Millennium Development Goals
Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University
Feb 10, 2012
www.flickr.com
|
