Comparing U.S. And European Architecture
21 December 2001 - 4:00am
Sarah Williams Goldhagen asks why contemporary architecture in the U.S. is so "boring" and "bad."
"[In] this country, we too often forget that high-quality architecture is also a social good, one that more than repays the investment...It's not that Americans aren't interested in good architecture; after all, they often head to Europe on summer vacation...American architecture is, as a rule, conventional, bland, and dull...Why, to be blunt, is contemporary American architecture so bad?"
Full Story:
Architecture: Boring Buildings
Source:
The American Prospect, December 17, 2001
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- Using Adaptive Reuse to Scale the Urban Future - Feb 08, 2012
- The Collapse of the Architecture Profession - Feb 06, 2012
- A Reality Check for Architects - Jan 19, 2012
- The Challenges of Building A House on Mars - Jan 09, 2012
- Taking Parking Lots Seriously, as Public Spaces - Jan 07, 2012
“
New Suburbanism is not a new design paradigm that seeks to compete with or discredit principles of New Urbanism. Instead, our perspective represents a broad-based attempt to find the best, most practical ways to develop and redevelop suburban communities.
”


















