Comparing U.S. And European Architecture
21 December 2001 - 4:00am
Sarah Williams Goldhagen asks why contemporary architecture in the U.S. is so "boring" and "bad."
"[In] this country, we too often forget that high-quality architecture is also a social good, one that more than repays the investment...It's not that Americans aren't interested in good architecture; after all, they often head to Europe on summer vacation...American architecture is, as a rule, conventional, bland, and dull...Why, to be blunt, is contemporary American architecture so bad?"
Full Story:
Architecture: Boring Buildings
Source:
The American Prospect, December 17, 2001
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- 'No Credits, Just Prerequisites' - Nov 06, 2009
- Alex MacLean: Surveying a Changed Landscape - Oct 29, 2009
- The End of An Era for Arts Centers - Oct 29, 2009
- The Complex Legacy of Julius Shulman - Oct 20, 2009
- Sustainability is a Lifestyle, Not an Accessory - Sep 17, 2009
“
Evidence is observable in cities across the country, however, that urban regeneration only comes with the reclamation and restoration of old neighborhoods, not through demolition and landbanking.
”

















