Are Satellite Cities the Smart Alternative to Urban Sprawl or Pie in the Sky?

Kai Laursen argues for satellite cities as a promising alternative to accommodate population growth, while preserving open space and farmland, and minimizing urban sprawl.
March 16, 2012, 9am PDT | Jonathan Nettler | @nettsj
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email Comments

Laursen sees infill development alone as inadequate to meet the world's long-term need to house 9 billion individuals by 2050.

Rather, he sees a solution in developing satellite cities, which he defines as "planned cities...surrounded by greenbelt areas and..connected to the greater metropolitan area by an efficient rail system...[and] differ[ing] from suburbs, subdivisions, and bedroom communities in that they have municipal governments distinct from that of the core metropolis and employment bases sufficient to support their resident populations."

In his utopian vision, Laursen imagines a "satellite solar city" that would be carbon neutral and car-free, and utilize seemingly every novel energy and transportation concept currently in circulation, including personal rapid transit (PRT).

Full Story:
Published on Wednesday, March 7, 2012 in Urban Land
Share Tweet LinkedIn Email