If Sprawl Is A Defense, It's Fighting The Last War
30 October 2001 - 2:00pm
Do dense cities or sprawling suburbs make the best defense against terrorism?
"Op-ed columnists have tried to defend cities from the argument that sprawl saves lives by calling for courage to face down the enemy and for a commitment to the 1990's downtown revival. But the best argument for cities is not that we should stand our ground and dare the terrorists to kill us. No thanks. The best argument for cities is that they're safer. Emergency response time, public health systems, and defensible utilities are better reasons for preserving urban density than sprawl-fighting ever was."
Full Story:
Our secret weapon against terror
Source:
The Philadelphia Daily News, October 30, 2001
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
- NYT Editorial Blasts House Transportation Bill - Feb 10, 2012
- House and Senate Transportation Bills on a Collision Course - Feb 08, 2012
- The Obama Administration's Crusade for Homeowners - Feb 07, 2012
- A Federal Assault on Transit - Feb 06, 2012
- A Shift of Attention to Local Planning Policies by the Tea Party Becomes National News - Feb 06, 2012
“
Its very unsuitability for an urban center justifies its current usage as a suburban or ex-urban pattern.
”


















